Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
update
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
skissler committed Jun 12, 2023
1 parent 800a53b commit 63d3c18
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 16,979 additions and 46 deletions.
46 changes: 0 additions & 46 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,49 +15,3 @@ This repository accompanies the manuscript "Viral kinetics of sequential SARS-Co
- `save_figures.R` saves those figures
- `clearbigvars.R` clears storage-heavy variables to avoid crashing R or needlessly slowing down operations.
- `indiv_analysis_revised.R` runs the Spearman correlation analysis to detect persistence in viral kinetic parameters within individuals across first and second infections.


---

## Reviews

- [ ] Conduct restricted analysis, considering only individuals with well-documented first and second infections
- [ ] Complete editorial policy checklist
- [ ] Complete reporting summary
- [ ] Note in cover letter that sex/gender data were not systematically collected and so not analyzed


- [ ] Find a way to make the comparisons even more concrete...
- [ ] Generate schematic to summarize the overall conclusions in the various groups
- [ ] Check if there is a relationship between the number of exposures and the clearance rate
- [ ] Describe statistical models in full, including: the form of the model, the parameters that are estimated, and the priors. Also: which Ct values were below LOD? How were these treated? Consider incorporating these rather than fully excluding them.
- [ ] Clarify that the pairwise clearance analysis really is just Spearman correlation. Maybe reduce some of the explanatory text there. Consider using standard approaches to calculate the p-value rather than bootstrapping.
- [ ] Consider including the clearance time consistency in the model itself, or at least including uncertainty in the clearance time estimates in the spearman correlation.


- [ ] Re-phrase the caption in figure 1: "I would suggest to rephrase it and say "no well-documented pre-Omicron infection" or something similar"
- [ ] Come up with a simplified representation of the comparison groups and present it as Fig 1 panel C (fits in with a previous comment too) - because Supp Table 1 is too confusing.
- [ ] Explain unexpected differences in Supp Table 1 counts in the caption.
- [ ] 88-90: define mean proliferation time, clearance time, and peak viral load.
- [ ] Note that people continued testing daily when possible even after testing positive
- [ ] Ask Joseph about standard curve stability over time
- [ ] Note brackets in Supp Table 2 are 95% CIs.
- [ ] Note in the Discussion/limitations that we didn't measure infectious virus.


- [ ] Clarify "summary of recorded infections" since Supp Table 1 is hard to read.
- [ ] Clarify who is being compared in lines 90-96
- [ ] Figure 1B: clarify why n = 235 in the caption is greater than 193 in the text.
- [ ] Focus main figures on 58 infections with well-documented first and second infections and leave the other analyses to the supplement... (I don't agree)
- [ ] Repeat Figure 2 but only including the 58 with two well-documented infections.
- [ ] Explain why the confidence intervals in Figure 2A are narrow
- [ ] 115-117: explain what "greater symmetry" means (rephrase, and maybe a brief mention of why we care)
- [ ] 123-126: Clarify differences in numbers here.








Loading

0 comments on commit 63d3c18

Please sign in to comment.