Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: udevd rules controller #7164

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

frezbo
Copy link
Member

@frezbo frezbo commented May 1, 2023

Use a controller for udevd rules.

@frezbo
Copy link
Member Author

frezbo commented May 1, 2023

New resources:

❯ talosctl -n 10.5.0.3 get udevrules
WARNING: 10.5.0.3: server version 1.4.0-alpha.4-46-g7554a3557-dirty is older than client version 1.4.1
NODE       NAMESPACE   TYPE       ID         VERSION
10.5.0.3   files       UdevRule   1sr89jxq   1

❯ talosctl -n 10.5.0.3 get udevrules -o yaml
WARNING: 10.5.0.3: server version 1.4.0-alpha.4-46-g7554a3557-dirty is older than client version 1.4.1
node: 10.5.0.3
metadata:
    namespace: files
    type: UdevRules.files.talos.dev
    id: 1sr89jxq
    version: 1
    owner: files.UdevRuleController
    phase: running
    created: 2023-05-01T18:50:14Z
    updated: 2023-05-01T18:50:14Z
spec:
    rule: SUBSYSTEM=="block", KERNEL=="vdb*", SYMLINK+="mygreathdd%n"

❯ talosctl -n 10.5.0.3 get udevrulestatus
WARNING: 10.5.0.3: server version 1.4.0-alpha.4-46-g7554a3557-dirty is older than client version 1.4.1
NODE       NAMESPACE   TYPE             ID     VERSION
10.5.0.3   files       UdevRuleStatus   udev   1

❯ talosctl -n 10.5.0.3 get udevrulestatus -o yaml
WARNING: 10.5.0.3: server version 1.4.0-alpha.4-46-g7554a3557-dirty is older than client version 1.4.1
node: 10.5.0.3
metadata:
    namespace: files
    type: UdevRuleStatuses.files.talos.dev
    id: udev
    version: 1
    owner: files.UdevRuleFileController
    phase: running
    created: 2023-05-01T18:50:13Z
    updated: 2023-05-01T18:50:13Z
spec:
    active: true

❯ talosctl -n 10.5.0.3 read /usr/etc/udev/rules.d/99-talos.rules
SUBSYSTEM=="block", KERNEL=="vdb*", SYMLINK+="mygreathdd%n"

@@ -202,6 +202,12 @@ issues:
- path: internal/app/machined/pkg/system/services
linters:
- dupl
- path: internal/app/machined/pkg/controllers/files
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

golangcilint seems really weird now, maybe it;s my cache

@@ -84,29 +85,6 @@ func (suite *CRISeccompProfileSuite) TestReconcileSeccompProfile() {
})
}

suite.AssertWithin(1*time.Second, 100*time.Millisecond, func() error {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this was already handled in the test case above


suite.AssertWithin(1*time.Second, 100*time.Millisecond, func() error {
_, err := ctest.Get[*criseccompresource.SeccompProfile](
suite,
criseccompresource.NewSeccompProfile("deny.json").Metadata(),
)
if err != nil {
if !state.IsNotFoundError(err) {
return err
if state.IsNotFoundError(err) {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this test was always broken 😅

}
}

func (ctrl *UdevRuleController) generateRuleHash(rule string) string {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is done since we don't take in rule name from machine config

// Run implements controller.Controller interface.
//
// nolint:gocyclo
func (ctrl *UdevRuleFileController) Run(ctx context.Context, r controller.Runtime, logger *zap.Logger) error {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm confused on how to handle this, currently this behaves like the previous implementation, write all rules to a single file and reload udev. Another option could be have individual file for each rule, but then I am confused on how to prefix file names (priority order based on numeric prefix) and the cleanup process, do we only delete the file the controller created or all other files under the folder (since extensions also bring in udev rules into the same directory)


if _, err := cmd.RunContext(ctx, "/sbin/udevadm", "trigger", "--type=subsystems", "--action=add"); err != nil {
return err
_, err = st.WatchFor(ctx, resourcefiles.NewUdevRuleStatus("udev").Metadata(), state.WithCondition(func(r resource.Resource) (bool, error) {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure if there's a better way to wait for the rules 🤔

Use a controller for udevd rules.

Signed-off-by: Noel Georgi <[email protected]>
@frezbo frezbo force-pushed the feat/udev-rules-controller branch from 2ea45f6 to 6448762 Compare May 2, 2023 18:22
@frezbo frezbo marked this pull request as draft May 2, 2023 18:24
@frezbo
Copy link
Member Author

frezbo commented May 2, 2023

After discussion with @smira we need to do some planning around the sequencer tasks and probably start with the last task in the sequencer to be converted to a controller.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 5, 2024

This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jul 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants