Skip to content

Optimize Opus 5 workflow prompts and execution contracts - #150

Merged
shinpr merged 23 commits into
mainfrom
refactor/opus5-efficiency-contract-alignment
Jul 28, 2026
Merged

Optimize Opus 5 workflow prompts and execution contracts#150
shinpr merged 23 commits into
mainfrom
refactor/opus5-efficiency-contract-alignment

Conversation

@shinpr

@shinpr shinpr commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Optimize Opus 5 workflow prompts for execution efficiency while preserving mandatory orchestration and task tracking.
  • Tighten agent handoff and output contracts across implementation, quality, integration-test, security, and verification flows.
  • Reduce duplicated prompt content and move shared execution rules to their canonical skills.
  • Align generated plugin namespaces, skill metadata, and package versions for the 0.22.8 release.

Key changes

  • Bound exploration and completed diffs to approved decisions, scope, and total size budgets.
  • Gate task expansion on Direct MVP and sourced hard constraints.
  • Carry mutation evidence, authoritative quality commands, governing documents, and blocked states through their consumers.
  • Add first-pass irreversible-risk coverage, shared-mutation route parity, and consumer-observable capability postconditions.
  • Centralize post-verification fix-task handoff and remove redundant recipe guidance.
  • Validate generated local agent namespaces during plugin sync.

Validation

  • pnpm run sync
  • pnpm run sync:check
  • pnpm run check:skills-index
  • claude plugin validate --strict .claude-plugin/marketplace.json
  • Strict validation for all four generated plugins
  • git diff --check

@shinpr shinpr self-assigned this Jul 28, 2026
@shinpr
shinpr force-pushed the refactor/opus5-efficiency-contract-alignment branch from d2643b3 to aeb22be Compare July 28, 2026 02:04
@shinpr
shinpr merged commit a52bbcf into main Jul 28, 2026
1 check passed
@shinpr
shinpr deleted the refactor/opus5-efficiency-contract-alignment branch July 28, 2026 02:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant