Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regenerated and removed unnecessary flag from build script command #202

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Dec 24, 2024

Conversation

codebycarson
Copy link
Collaborator

@codebycarson codebycarson commented Dec 4, 2024

This PR fixes some build issues introduced into the system with the latest @sei-js/cosmos release. This PR adjusts the directories for readability and clarity, removes the protobuf generation step from the github action, and does other general package cleanup.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 4, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 1e1b6a0

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 24, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 1.97044% with 199 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 4.67%. Comparing base (548ed9f) to head (f15e039).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
packages/cosmos/library/encoding/evm/gov.ts 1.23% 160 Missing ⚠️
...ges/cosmos/library/encoding/tokenfactory/params.ts 0.00% 19 Missing ⚠️
...library/encoding/cosmos/accesscontrol/constants.ts 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
packages/cosmos/library/encoding/evm/enums.ts 0.00% 10 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #202       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.47%   4.67%   -79.80%     
==========================================
  Files          16     212      +196     
  Lines         161   44030    +43869     
  Branches       25   15793    +15768     
==========================================
+ Hits          136    2058     +1922     
- Misses         25   41972    +41947     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@codebycarson codebycarson requested review from mj850 and dssei December 24, 2024 02:38
Copy link
Collaborator

@mj850 mj850 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good in general! Just have questions about the necessity of fetch-depth: 0 in some workflows

@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ jobs:
steps:
- name: Check out code
uses: actions/checkout@v2
with:
fetch-depth: 0 # Fetch the full history instead of a shallow clone
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Curious why we need this here

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can see why it's needed in release.yml since it deals with changesets and tags, but not sure about this workflow

@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ jobs:
steps:
- name: Checkout Repo
uses: actions/checkout@v3

with:
fetch-depth: 0 # Fetch the full history instead of a shallow clone
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also can't tell why this is needed here

@codebycarson codebycarson merged commit 489556b into main Dec 24, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants