Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add EVM query/msg types #73

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 30, 2024
Merged

Add EVM query/msg types #73

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 30, 2024

Conversation

codchen
Copy link
Contributor

@codchen codchen commented Mar 6, 2024

Add query/message support for evm bindings

@codchen codchen requested review from udpatil and Kbhat1 March 6, 2024 01:33
@ARitz-Cracker
Copy link

Sweet, looking good! One thing to ask, before it was mentioned to me that the reason why the ERC20/721 queries existed was because they where also helpers that translated sei addresses to 0x addresses. For anyone else looking at the crates documentation, that functionality won't be immediately obvious. Do all of the "address" String fields take sei* or 0x* addresses? The answer isn't clearly communicated right now and we shouldn't have to look at the go source code to understand how we should utilize this.

@codchen codchen requested review from besated and dssei March 28, 2024 02:28
}
ExecuteMsg::TestOccIteratorRange { start, end } => {
test_occ_iterator_range(deps, env, info, start, end)
}
ExecuteMsg::TestOccParallelism { value } => test_occ_parallelism(deps, env, info, value),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Curious if there are plans to also add tests for new evm functionality (and possibly extend the integration module)?

@dssei
Copy link
Contributor

dssei commented Mar 28, 2024

We may also need to update this readme

@codchen codchen merged commit a2fb892 into main Mar 30, 2024
4 checks passed
@codchen codchen deleted the evm branch March 30, 2024 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants