Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated DDS RTPS Vendor IDs using DDS-Foundation spec #4159

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2023

Conversation

cdenicola
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This PR updates the map from RTPS Vendor ID to RTPS product name and company. This change follows the DDS Foundation's official mapping ((link)[https://www.dds-foundation.org/dds-rtps-vendor-and-product-ids/]).

Checklist:

  • If you are new to Scapy: I have checked CONTRIBUTING.md (esp. section submitting-pull-requests)
  • I squashed commits belonging together
  • I added unit tests or explained why they are not relevant
  • I executed the regression tests (using cd test && ./run_tests or tox)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 24, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #4159 (dc7b1fe) into master (d54a457) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4159      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.78%   81.77%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         330      330              
  Lines       76331    76340       +9     
==========================================
- Hits        62431    62428       -3     
- Misses      13900    13912      +12     
Files Coverage Δ
scapy/contrib/rtps/common_types.py 95.27% <ø> (ø)

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

@gpotter2 gpotter2 merged commit 2150170 into secdev:master Nov 19, 2023
18 of 19 checks passed
@gpotter2 gpotter2 added this to the 2.6.0 milestone Nov 28, 2023
@gpotter2 gpotter2 mentioned this pull request Feb 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants