-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
feat: consensus #68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+297
−92
Merged
feat: consensus #68
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
f2d84c9
feat: replace secp256 with alloy_primitives
greged93 5c686e7
feat: implement PoAConsensus
greged93 c703555
Merge branch 'main' into feat/consensus
greged93 a0582c6
feat: initialize the consensus engine
greged93 c1f66b1
feat: add a dev mode to the rollup node along with a NoopConsensus
greged93 5c07e55
fix: incorrect fcs update
greged93 b816c54
fix: lints
greged93 337e423
Merge branch 'main' into feat/consensus
greged93 ff44868
Merge branch 'main' into feat/consensus
greged93 550eb7b
fix: merge
greged93 9be380f
chore: revert args changes
greged93 e0516c5
fix: address comments
greged93 e80153d
fix: address comment
greged93 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know we talked about reintroducing these lines of code:
and I tried running the node with them, but I didn't see any trigger of the pipeline sync. I think what happened is that it hits this path in the match, meaning it doesn't trigger a sync. My opinion is to keep the code as is, and implement a EL sync and CL sync similar to what optimism are doing.
EDIT: forgot to link the code in Reth.
https://github.com/scroll-tech/reth/blob/1b8ff78f46d5e95dd10876fd8145c27db598a0b0/crates/engine/tree/src/tree/mod.rs#L2075