Skip to content

feat(L1Reader): change to NextUnfinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex and add GetFinalizedStateRootByBatchIndex #1160

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 28, 2025

Conversation

jonastheis
Copy link

@jonastheis jonastheis commented Mar 27, 2025

1. Purpose or design rationale of this PR

change FinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex to NextUnfinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex

2. PR title

Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: yarn, eslint, typescript)
  • ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: vercel, github, cypress)
  • docs: Documentation-only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that doesn't fix a bug, or add a feature, or improves performance
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

3. Deployment tag versioning

Has the version in params/version.go been updated?

  • This PR doesn't involve a new deployment, git tag, docker image tag, and it doesn't affect traces
  • Yes

4. Breaking change label

Does this PR have the breaking-change label?

  • This PR is not a breaking change
  • Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added the ability to fetch finalized state roots by batch index.
  • Improvements
    • Updated terminology for message queue index retrieval to improve clarity.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new method for retrieving finalized state roots by batch index from the ScrollChain contract, adds a constant for the corresponding ABI method name, and renames an existing method to clarify its purpose while simplifying its logic. The new method handles ABI packing, contract calls, and result unpacking with error handling. No other methods or control flows are modified beyond these targeted changes.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
rollup/l1/reader.go Added finalizedStateRoots constant; renamed and simplified FinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex to NextUnfinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex; added new method GetFinalizedStateRootByBatchIndex for contract calls to retrieve finalized state roots by batch index.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant Reader
    participant ScrollChainContract

    Caller->>Reader: GetFinalizedStateRootByBatchIndex(blockNumber, batchIndex)
    Reader->>Reader: Pack calldata for finalizedStateRoots(batchIndex)
    Reader->>ScrollChainContract: Call finalizedStateRoots(batchIndex)
    ScrollChainContract-->>Reader: Return finalized state root (common.Hash)
    Reader->>Caller: Return finalized state root or error
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jonastheis
  • colinlyguo

Poem

A hop and a jump, a new root to find,
Now batch by batch, the hashes unwind.
With names made clear and logic light,
The chain’s new roots are now in sight.
🐇✨ Onward we go, with code so bright!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d178b00 and cdf3f1d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rollup/l1/reader.go (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
rollup/l1/reader.go (1)
interfaces.go (1)
  • CallMsg (115-133)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rollup/l1/reader.go (3)

26-26: Looks good - new constant for the ABI method name.

Adding this constant follows the existing pattern in the file for ABI method names, which is good for consistency.


76-97: Function rename improves clarity of its purpose.

The function renaming from FinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex to NextUnfinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex better reflects what this method actually returns - the next unfinalized index in the queue. This rename makes the code more self-documenting and improves maintainability.

Also, removing the decrement operation simplifies the logic to align with the function's renamed purpose.


121-141:

✅ Verification successful

New method follows established patterns and provides necessary functionality.

This new method GetFinalizedStateRootByBatchIndex follows the same pattern as other contract call methods in the file:

  1. Pack the method name and arguments
  2. Make the contract call
  3. Unpack the result
  4. Return the result or appropriate errors

The error handling is thorough and properly contextualized. The implementation is consistent with the codebase's style.

Let's verify that all consumers of this new method are prepared to handle any errors it may return:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Find where this new method is called to verify error handling
rg -A 3 "GetFinalizedStateRootByBatchIndex" --type go

Length of output: 437


No existing consumers for GetFinalizedStateRootByBatchIndex

I searched the codebase for calls to GetFinalizedStateRootByBatchIndex and found none. There are currently no call sites to verify error handling against.

• When you add consumers of this method, ensure each caller properly handles the returned error.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

yiweichi added 3 commits April 3, 2025 05:17
* feat(L1Reader): add GetFinalizedStateRootByBatchIndex

* fix: FinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex return type

* fix: get state root batchIndex type
@yiweichi yiweichi marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2025 07:55
@yiweichi yiweichi requested review from yiweichi and colinlyguo April 25, 2025 23:04
@yiweichi yiweichi changed the title feat(L1Reader): change FinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex to NextUnfinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex feat(L1Reader): change to NextUnfinalizedL1MessageQueueIndex and add GetFinalizedStateRootByBatchIndex Apr 25, 2025
@yiweichi
Copy link
Member

merging this.

@yiweichi yiweichi merged commit eaf06e3 into develop Apr 28, 2025
14 checks passed
@yiweichi yiweichi deleted the feat/l1-reader-next-unfinalized-message branch April 28, 2025 07:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants