Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revisions after reviews #25

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

cyrush
Copy link

@cyrush cyrush commented Jul 3, 2014

Hello SciPy 2012 Program Committee Members,

I made several improvements based on the reviewers’ suggestions, including:

related work: added new section (w/ several new references) on background + timeline on other mesh-based visualization tools that leverage python

why python for VisIt?: added brief info on the reasons python was selected for scripting by the VisIt team in 2001

client interface API details: details about VisIt’s C++ RPC infrastructure and why the client API is procedural / modal

general: fixed some grammar issues, simplified verbiage in a few sections, used the abbreviation “CLI” more consistently

-Cyrus

related work: added new section (w/ several new references) on background + timeline on other mesh-based visualization tools that leverage python

why python for VisIt?: added brief info on the reasons python was selected for scripting by the VisIt team in 2001

client interface API details: details about VisIt’s C++ RPC infrastructure and why the client API is procedural / modal

general: fixed some grammar issues, simplified verbiage in a few sections, used the abbreviation “CLI” more consistently
@ahmadia
Copy link
Member

ahmadia commented Jul 3, 2014

Thanks @cyrush - this looks good.

@aashish24
Copy link

@cyrush I will have a look at it today.

@ahmadia
Copy link
Member

ahmadia commented Jul 4, 2014

Thanks @aashish24!

@davclark
Copy link

davclark commented Jul 4, 2014

I had a quick look. As I said, I was already comfortable with the paper, and these changes are an improvement! So, to be clear, I'm happy to sign off.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants