Update main.tex

papers/Gagnon_Kebe_Tahiri/main.tex

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ \subsection{Data pre-processing}
 
 In the BOLD Systems database, taxonomic ranks such as family, genus, and species of the sampled Cumacea were included in our data. These are composed of seven families of Cumacea: Diastylidae ($n=21$), Lampropidae ($n=13$), Leuconidae ($n=12$), Nannastacidae ($n=7$), Bodotriidae ($n=4$), Ceratocumatidae ($n=3$) and Pseudocumatidae ($n=2$). A total of 21 species of Cumacea are found in our sample (see Figure \ref{fig:fig2}).
 
-The habitat and water mass of the sampling points are the only attributes that were taken directly via Table 1 of \citep{uhlir_adding_2021}. Thus, the definitions of water bodies described by \citep{hansen_north_2000, brix2010distribution, ostmann_marine_2014} were used as a reference for the GIN seas around Iceland: Arctic Polar Water (APW, $n=15$), Iceland Sea Overflow Water (ISOW, $n=15$), North Atlantic Water (NAW, $n=9$), Arctic Polar Water/Norwegian Sea Arctic Intermediate Water (APW/NSAIW, $n=7$), warm Norwegian Sea Deep Water (NSDWw, $n=8$), Labrador Sea Water (LSW, $n=3$), cold Norwegian Sea Deep Water (NSDWc, $n=3$) and Norwegian Sea Arctic Intermediate Water (NSAIW, $n=2$) (see Figure \ref{fig:fig3}). In terms of habitat, we considered the three categories used in \citep{uhlir_adding_2021}: deep sea ($n=38$), shelf ($n=15$) and slope ($n=9$) (see Figure \ref{fig:fig4}).
+The habitat and water mass of the sampling points are the only attributes that were taken directly via Table 1 of \citep{uhlir_adding_2021}. Thus, the definitions of water bodies described by \citep{hansen_north_2000, brix2010distribution,ostmann_marine_2014} were used as a reference for the GIN seas around Iceland: Arctic Polar Water (APW, $n=15$), Iceland Sea Overflow Water (ISOW, $n=15$), North Atlantic Water (NAW, $n=9$), Arctic Polar Water/Norwegian Sea Arctic Intermediate Water (APW/NSAIW, $n=7$), warm Norwegian Sea Deep Water (NSDWw, $n=8$), Labrador Sea Water (LSW, $n=3$), cold Norwegian Sea Deep Water (NSDWc, $n=3$) and Norwegian Sea Arctic Intermediate Water (NSAIW, $n=2$) (see Figure \ref{fig:fig3}). In terms of habitat, we considered the three categories used in \citep{uhlir_adding_2021}: deep sea ($n=38$), shelf ($n=15$) and slope ($n=9$) (see Figure \ref{fig:fig4}).
 
 In order to better interpret the relation and evolutionary responses of benthic species, genetic data are needed \citep{wilson_speciation_1987,uhlir_adding_2021}. The aligned DNA sequence of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene region of each of the samples will be included in our analyses. In order to understand  Thus, we consider 62 of the 306 aligned DNA sequences that were used for phylogenetic analyses of \citep{uhlir_adding_2021}. Since some of the specimens in our sample have their DNA sequence aligned duplicated, or even quadrupled with a difference of one to two nucleotides, we considered the longest aligned DNA sequence for each specimen. Figures  \ref{fig:fig1},  \ref{fig:fig2}, \ref{fig:fig5} and \ref{fig:fig6} were made from Python 3.11, while Figures \ref{fig:fig3} and \ref{fig:fig4} were made from RStudio Desktop 4.3.2.