Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Validate] Add metadata filtering for evaluation functions to metrics #268

Open
wants to merge 33 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gatli
Copy link
Contributor

@gatli gatli commented Mar 30, 2022

No description provided.

gatli and others added 30 commits March 30, 2022 12:33
* work in progress

* work in progress

* Big refactor to make things cleaner + enable retries properly on infra flakes for local upload

* work in progress refactor of annotation upload

* Fixed segmentation bugs

* Fix one more bug and remove use of annotate_segmentation endpoint

* refactor tests and add segmentation local upload test

* Tests passing

* Review feedback

* Initial pass at client changes for prediction segmentation upload

* relevant tests pass

Co-authored-by: Ubuntu <[email protected]>
* fix camera_model initialization

* bump version number
add new set model as baseline functions to client, remove add_criteria in favor of add_eval_function, bump version number and changelog
@gatli gatli changed the base branch from master to metrics_3d March 31, 2022 13:05
@gatli gatli changed the base branch from metrics_3d to master March 31, 2022 13:05
@gatli gatli changed the title Add metadata filtering for evaluation functions Add metadata filtering for evaluation functions to metrics Mar 31, 2022
@gatli gatli changed the title Add metadata filtering for evaluation functions to metrics [Validate] Add metadata filtering for evaluation functions to metrics Mar 31, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants