json bomFormat #99
Merged
json bomFormat #99
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
raboof
approved these changes
Dec 12, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great!
I suppose longer-term we might want to restructure the commands structure so you can more easily generate (and publish) xml, json or both, but that can be a separate activity - this is already great. I don't have a strong preference for the defaults here.
…n-bom # Conflicts: # README.md # src/main/scala/com/github/sbt/sbom/BomExtractor.scala # src/main/scala/com/github/sbt/sbom/BomSbtSettings.scala # src/sbt-test/dependencies/integrationTest/etc/bom.xml
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've added a configurable bomFormat with json support.
Should json be new default format? I saw that some tooling is using it as the new default.
fixes #91