a CSS selector compiler/engine
css-select turns CSS selectors into functions that tests if elements match them. When searching for elements, testing is executed "from the top", similar to how browsers execute CSS selectors.
In its default configuration, css-select queries the DOM structure of the
domhandler
module (also known as
htmlparser2 DOM). It uses domutils
as its
default adapter over the DOM structure. See Options below for details on
querying alternative DOM structures.
Features:
- Full implementation of CSS3 selectors
- Partial implementation of jQuery/Sizzle extensions
- Very high test coverage
- Pretty good performance
The traditional approach of executing CSS selectors, named left-to-right
execution, is to execute every component of the selector in order, from left to
right (duh). The execution of the selector a b
for example will first query
for a
elements, then search these for b
elements. (That's the approach of
eg. Sizzle
,
nwmatcher
and
qwery
.)
While this works, it has some downsides: Children of a
s will be checked
multiple times; first, to check if they are also a
s, then, for every superior
a
once, if they are b
s. Using
Big O notation, that would be
O(n^(k+1))
, where k
is the number of descendant selectors (that's the space
in the example above).
The far more efficient approach is to first look for b
elements, then check if
they have superior a
elements: Using big O notation again, that would be
O(n)
. That's called right-to-left execution.
And that's what css-select does – and why it's quite performant.
By building a stack of functions.
Wait, what?
Okay, so let's suppose we want to compile the selector a b
again, for
right-to-left execution. We start by parsing the selector, which means we turn
the selector into an array of the building-blocks of the selector, so we can
distinguish them easily. That's what the
css-what
module is for, if you want to
have a look.
Anyway, after parsing, we end up with an array like this one:
[
{ type: "tag", name: "a" },
{ type: "descendant" },
{ type: "tag", name: "b" },
];
Actually, this array is wrapped in another array, but that's another story (involving commas in selectors).
Now that we know the meaning of every part of the selector, we can compile it. That's where it becomes interesting.
The basic idea is to turn every part of the selector into a function, which takes an element as its only argument. The function checks whether a passed element matches its part of the selector: If it does, the element is passed to the next turned-into-a-function part of the selector, which does the same. If an element is accepted by all parts of the selector, it matches the selector and double rainbow ALL THE WAY.
As said before, we want to do right-to-left execution with all the big O
improvements nonsense, so elements are passed from the rightmost part of the
selector (b
in our example) to the leftmost (which would be of course
c
a
).
//TODO: More in-depth description. Implementation details. Build a spaceship.
const CSSselect = require("css-select");
Note: css-select throws errors when invalid selectors are passed to it, contrary to the behavior in browsers, which swallow them. This is done to aid with writing css selectors, but can be unexpected when processing arbitrary strings.
Queries elems
, returns an array containing all matches.
query
can be either a CSS selector or a function.elems
can be either an array of elements, or a single element. If it is an element, its children will be queried.options
is described below.
Aliases: default
export, CSSselect.iterate(query, elems)
.
Compiles the query, returns a function.
Tests whether or not an element is matched by query
. query
can be either a
CSS selector or a function.
Arguments are the same as for CSSselect.selectAll(query, elems)
. Only returns
the first match, or null
if there was no match.
All options are optional.
xmlMode
: When enabled, tag names will be case-sensitive. Default:false
.rootFunc
: The last function in the stack, will be called with the last element that's looked at.adapter
: The adapter to use when interacting with the backing DOM structure. By default it uses thedomutils
module.context
: The context of the current query. Used to limit the scope of searches. Can be matched directly using the:scope
pseudo-selector.cacheResults
: Allow css-select to cache results for some selectors, sometimes greatly improving querying performance. Disable this if your document can change in between queries with the same compiled selector. Default:true
.
A custom adapter must match the interface described here.
You may want to have a look at domutils
to
see the default implementation, or at
css-select-browser-adapter
for an implementation backed by the DOM.
As defined by CSS 4 and / or jQuery.
- Selector lists
(
,
) - Universal
(
*
) - Type
(
<tagname>
) - Descendant
(
- Child
(
>
) - Parent (
<
) - Adjacent sibling
(
+
) - General sibling
(
~
) - Attribute
(
[attr=foo]
), with supported comparisons:[attr]
(existential)=
~=
|=
*=
^=
$=
!=
- Also,
i
can be added after the comparison to make the comparison case-insensitive (eg.[attr=foo i]
)
- Pseudos:
:not
:contains
:icontains
(case-insensitive version of:contains
):has
:root
:empty
:parent
:first-child
,:last-child
,:first-of-type
,:last-of-type
:only-of-type
,:only-child
:nth-child
,:nth-last-child
,:nth-of-type
,:nth-last-of-type
,:link
,:any-link
:visited
,:hover
,:active
(these depend on optionalAdapter
methods, so these will only match elements if implemented inAdapter
):selected
,:checked
:enabled
,:disabled
:required
,:optional
:header
,:button
,:input
,:text
,:checkbox
,:file
,:password
,:reset
,:radio
etc.:is
, plus its legacy alias:matches
:scope
(uses the context from the passed options)
License: BSD-2-Clause
To report a security vulnerability, please use the Tidelift security contact. Tidelift will coordinate the fix and disclosure.
Available as part of the Tidelift Subscription
The maintainers of css-select
and thousands of other packages are working with
Tidelift to deliver commercial support and maintenance for the open source
dependencies you use to build your applications. Save time, reduce risk, and
improve code health, while paying the maintainers of the exact dependencies you
use.
Learn more.