Ignore all debuginfo tests for LLDB that we do not run in CI

[workingjubilee]

We only run LLDB 1500 in CI. Any test with a min-lldb-version above that is currently ignored. It's not clear any of these tests actually work with that LLDB version, and they definitely don't work on LLDB ~2100. So, ignore them until we fix debuginfo testing.

Fixes #151966

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[Zalathar]

I haven’t checked that it actually works, but I think we already have an //@ ignore-lldb directive which is effectively this but more explicit.

[workingjubilee]

Yep, that works!

[workingjubilee]

Now using ignore-lldb for all cases, and found this case also.

[Mark-Simulacrum]

Can we either put this in compiletest or leave an annotation for the ones that are lldb-version related? I expect we have some tests that are already ignored for other reasons on lldb and it would be nice to distinguish those cases, I think.

[workingjubilee]

I mean, the min-lldb-version: 9000 variant was pretty distinctive!

I'll add a comment.