-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14k
v0 mangling for std on nightly #149148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
v0 mangling for std on nightly #149148
Conversation
|
|
|
Makes sense, thanks! Prioritizing slightly since it still might get into today's nightly (although I worry some tests might fail..). @bors r+ p=1 |
v0 mangling for std on nightly Following #89917 and rust-lang/compiler-team#938, it doesn't make sense that `std` for these channels would have legacy mangling while the user's code would use `v0`. r? `@Kobzol`
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
|
Let's perf this in the meantime. @bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
v0 mangling for std on nightly
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Finished benchmarking commit (70ed8a5): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌ regressions - please read the text belowBenchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @bors rollup=never Instruction countOur most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (secondary 0.9%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
CyclesResults (primary -2.3%, secondary -6.0%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Binary sizeResults (primary 1.2%, secondary 5.1%)A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.
Bootstrap: 473.456s -> 472.364s (-0.23%) |
|
3% larger stdlib. Slightly annoying, but not a big deal, I think. #145343 might reduce that size considerably, once I can finally get back to it someday.. :D |
Following #89917 and rust-lang/compiler-team#938, it doesn't make sense that
stdfor these channels would have legacy mangling while the user's code would usev0.r? @Kobzol