Add test for href of reexported enum variant

[GuillaumeGomez]

Working on #148648 and realized that we actually didn't test for enum variants reexports, so here we are.

I also think I'll do #148648 at the same time as #148547.

r? @lolbinarycat

[Kobzol]

@rust-timer queue

(Just testing perfbot).

[lolbinarycat]

The filename and comment for the new file seem quite broad, but as far as I know enum variants are the only associated items that can be reexported, so maybe that should be changed to reflect the narrowness of the test?

@rustbot author

[GuillaumeGomez]

The filename and comment for the new file seem quite broad, but as far as I know enum variants are the only associated items that can be reexported, so maybe that should be changed to reflect the narrowness of the test?

Agreed. When I originally made the file, I thought we could reexport impl associated items. Discovered (again) that it's not possible.

@rustbot ready

[lolbinarycat]

That's funny, I also rediscovered you can't reexport associated items in the process of reviewing this PR.

I think the current file comment is ok, but could be better, maybe something like "tests that reexported enum variants correctly link to the original variant" or something.

you can r=me with or without the new comment once CI is green.

[rustbot]

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

[GuillaumeGomez]

@bors r=lolbinarycat rollup

[bors]

📌 Commit 8642d82 has been approved by lolbinarycat

It is now in the queue for this repository.