Skip to content

Improve recovery when users write where: #143065

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Improve recovery of where:.

Fixes #143023

The erroneous suggestion was because we were seeing : then a type, which the original impl thought must be a struct field. Make this a bit more accurate by checking for a non-reserved ident (which should be a field name).

Also, make a custom parser error for where: so we can continue parsing after the colon.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 26, 2025

r? @oli-obk

rustbot has assigned @oli-obk.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jun 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect help suggestion on a syntax error in the where part of an enum
3 participants