Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the wasm-component-ld tool #135850

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This commit updates the wasm-component-ld tool from 0.5.11 to 0.5.12. This pulls in a fix for the binary adapters that are included with this tool for an issue described in bytecodealliance/wasmtime#10058. Some other dependencies have additionally been updated in the meantime of wasm-component-ld but there should otherwise be no major changes.

This commit updates the `wasm-component-ld` tool from 0.5.11 to 0.5.12.
This pulls in a fix for the binary adapters that are included with this
tool for an issue described in bytecodealliance/wasmtime#10058. Some
other dependencies have additionally been updated in the meantime of
`wasm-component-ld` but there should otherwise be no major changes.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 21, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 21, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 21, 2025

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

r? jieyouxu @bors r+

@rustbot rustbot assigned jieyouxu and unassigned Mark-Simulacrum Jan 22, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 22, 2025

📌 Commit 8600694 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 22, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
…-ld, r=jieyouxu

Update the `wasm-component-ld` tool

This commit updates the `wasm-component-ld` tool from 0.5.11 to 0.5.12. This pulls in a fix for the binary adapters that are included with this tool for an issue described in bytecodealliance/wasmtime#10058. Some other dependencies have additionally been updated in the meantime of `wasm-component-ld` but there should otherwise be no major changes.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#135557 (Point at invalid utf-8 span on user's source code)
 - rust-lang#135596 (Properly note when query stack is being cut off)
 - rust-lang#135638 (Make it possible to build GCC on CI)
 - rust-lang#135648 (support wasm inline assembly in `naked_asm!`)
 - rust-lang#135826 (Misc. `rustc_resolve` cleanups)
 - rust-lang#135827 (CI: free disk with in-tree script instead of GitHub Action)
 - rust-lang#135850 (Update the `wasm-component-ld` tool)
 - rust-lang#135855 (Only assert the `Parser` size on specific arches)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants