Rollup of 7 pull requests

Cargo.toml

@@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
 resolver = "2"
 members = [
   "compiler/rustc",
+  "src/build_helper",
   "src/etc/test-float-parse",
   "src/rustc-std-workspace/rustc-std-workspace-core",
   "src/rustc-std-workspace/rustc-std-workspace-alloc",
   "src/rustc-std-workspace/rustc-std-workspace-std",
   "src/rustdoc-json-types",
-  "src/tools/build_helper",
   "src/tools/cargotest",
   "src/tools/clippy",
   "src/tools/clippy/clippy_dev",

compiler/rustc_attr/src/builtin.rs

@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ use rustc_session::lint::BuiltinLintDiag;
 use rustc_session::lint::builtin::UNEXPECTED_CFGS;
 use rustc_session::parse::feature_err;
 use rustc_session::{RustcVersion, Session};
+use rustc_span::Span;
 use rustc_span::hygiene::Transparency;
 use rustc_span::symbol::{Symbol, kw, sym};
-use rustc_span::{DUMMY_SP, Span};
 
 use crate::fluent_generated;
 use crate::session_diagnostics::{self, IncorrectReprFormatGenericCause};
@@ -92,9 +92,7 @@ impl Stability {
 #[derive(HashStable_Generic)]
 pub struct ConstStability {
     pub level: StabilityLevel,
-    /// This can be `None` for functions that do not have an explicit const feature.
-    /// We still track them for recursive const stability checks.
-    pub feature: Option<Symbol>,
+    pub feature: Symbol,
     /// This is true iff the `const_stable_indirect` attribute is present.
     pub const_stable_indirect: bool,
     /// whether the function has a `#[rustc_promotable]` attribute
@@ -272,22 +270,19 @@ pub fn find_stability(
 
 /// Collects stability info from `rustc_const_stable`/`rustc_const_unstable`/`rustc_promotable`
 /// attributes in `attrs`. Returns `None` if no stability attributes are found.
-///
-/// `is_const_fn` indicates whether this is a function marked as `const`.
 pub fn find_const_stability(
     sess: &Session,
     attrs: &[Attribute],
     item_sp: Span,
-    is_const_fn: bool,
 ) -> Option<(ConstStability, Span)> {
     let mut const_stab: Option<(ConstStability, Span)> = None;
     let mut promotable = false;
-    let mut const_stable_indirect = None;
+    let mut const_stable_indirect = false;
 
     for attr in attrs {
         match attr.name_or_empty() {
             sym::rustc_promotable => promotable = true,
-            sym::rustc_const_stable_indirect => const_stable_indirect = Some(attr.span),
+            sym::rustc_const_stable_indirect => const_stable_indirect = true,
             sym::rustc_const_unstable => {
                 if const_stab.is_some() {
                     sess.dcx()
@@ -299,7 +294,7 @@ pub fn find_const_stability(
                     const_stab = Some((
                         ConstStability {
                             level,
-                            feature: Some(feature),
+                            feature,
                             const_stable_indirect: false,
                             promotable: false,
                         },
@@ -317,7 +312,7 @@ pub fn find_const_stability(
                     const_stab = Some((
                         ConstStability {
                             level,
-                            feature: Some(feature),
+                            feature,
                             const_stable_indirect: false,
                             promotable: false,
                         },
@@ -340,7 +335,7 @@ pub fn find_const_stability(
             }
         }
     }
-    if const_stable_indirect.is_some() {
+    if const_stable_indirect {
         match &mut const_stab {
             Some((stab, _)) => {
                 if stab.is_const_unstable() {
@@ -351,36 +346,37 @@ pub fn find_const_stability(
                     })
                 }
             }
-            _ => {}
+            _ => {
+                // This function has no const stability attribute, but has `const_stable_indirect`.
+                // We ignore that; unmarked functions are subject to recursive const stability
+                // checks by default so we do carry out the user's intent.
+            }
         }
     }
-    // Make sure if `const_stable_indirect` is present, that is recorded. Also make sure all `const
-    // fn` get *some* marker, since we are a staged_api crate and therefore will do recursive const
-    // stability checks for them. We need to do this because the default for whether an unmarked
-    // function enforces recursive stability differs between staged-api crates and force-unmarked
-    // crates: in force-unmarked crates, only functions *explicitly* marked `const_stable_indirect`
-    // enforce recursive stability. Therefore when `lookup_const_stability` is `None`, we have to
-    // assume the function does not have recursive stability. All functions that *do* have recursive
-    // stability must explicitly record this, and so that's what we do for all `const fn` in a
-    // staged_api crate.
-    if (is_const_fn || const_stable_indirect.is_some()) && const_stab.is_none() {
-        let c = ConstStability {
-            feature: None,
-            const_stable_indirect: const_stable_indirect.is_some(),
-            promotable: false,
-            level: StabilityLevel::Unstable {
-                reason: UnstableReason::Default,
-                issue: None,
-                is_soft: false,
-                implied_by: None,
-            },
-        };
-        const_stab = Some((c, const_stable_indirect.unwrap_or(DUMMY_SP)));
-    }
 
     const_stab
 }
 
+/// Calculates the const stability for a const function in a `-Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked` crate
+/// without the `staged_api` feature.
+pub fn unmarked_crate_const_stab(
+    _sess: &Session,
+    attrs: &[Attribute],
+    regular_stab: Stability,
+) -> ConstStability {
+    assert!(regular_stab.level.is_unstable());
+    // The only attribute that matters here is `rustc_const_stable_indirect`.
+    // We enforce recursive const stability rules for those functions.
+    let const_stable_indirect =
+        attrs.iter().any(|a| a.name_or_empty() == sym::rustc_const_stable_indirect);
+    ConstStability {
+        feature: regular_stab.feature,
+        const_stable_indirect,
+        promotable: false,
+        level: regular_stab.level,
+    }
+}
+
 /// Collects stability info from `rustc_default_body_unstable` attributes in `attrs`.
 /// Returns `None` if no stability attributes are found.
 pub fn find_body_stability(

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/check.rs

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 use std::assert_matches::assert_matches;
 use std::borrow::Cow;
 use std::mem;
+use std::num::NonZero;
 use std::ops::Deref;
 
 use rustc_attr::{ConstStability, StabilityLevel};
@@ -709,24 +710,26 @@ impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for Checker<'_, 'tcx> {
 
                 // Intrinsics are language primitives, not regular calls, so treat them separately.
                 if let Some(intrinsic) = tcx.intrinsic(callee) {
+                    if !tcx.is_const_fn(callee) {
+                        // Non-const intrinsic.
+                        self.check_op(ops::IntrinsicNonConst { name: intrinsic.name });
+                        // If we allowed this, we're in miri-unleashed mode, so we might
+                        // as well skip the remaining checks.
+                        return;
+                    }
                     // We use `intrinsic.const_stable` to determine if this can be safely exposed to
                     // stable code, rather than `const_stable_indirect`. This is to make
                     // `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` an attribute that is always safe to add.
                     // We also ask is_safe_to_expose_on_stable_const_fn; this determines whether the intrinsic
                     // fallback body is safe to expose on stable.
                     let is_const_stable = intrinsic.const_stable
                         || (!intrinsic.must_be_overridden
-                            && tcx.is_const_fn(callee)
                             && is_safe_to_expose_on_stable_const_fn(tcx, callee));
                     match tcx.lookup_const_stability(callee) {
                         None => {
-                            // Non-const intrinsic.
-                            self.check_op(ops::IntrinsicNonConst { name: intrinsic.name });
-                        }
-                        Some(ConstStability { feature: None, .. }) => {
-                            // Intrinsic does not need a separate feature gate (we rely on the
-                            // regular stability checker). However, we have to worry about recursive
-                            // const stability.
+                            // This doesn't need a separate const-stability check -- const-stability equals
+                            // regular stability, and regular stability is checked separately.
+                            // However, we *do* have to worry about *recursive* const stability.
                             if !is_const_stable && self.enforce_recursive_const_stability() {
                                 self.dcx().emit_err(errors::UnmarkedIntrinsicExposed {
                                     span: self.span,
@@ -735,8 +738,8 @@ impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for Checker<'_, 'tcx> {
                             }
                         }
                         Some(ConstStability {
-                            feature: Some(feature),
                             level: StabilityLevel::Unstable { .. },
+                            feature,
                             ..
                         }) => {
                             self.check_op(ops::IntrinsicUnstable {
@@ -773,7 +776,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for Checker<'_, 'tcx> {
                     Some(ConstStability { level: StabilityLevel::Stable { .. }, .. }) => {
                         // All good.
                     }
-                    None | Some(ConstStability { feature: None, .. }) => {
+                    None => {
                         // This doesn't need a separate const-stability check -- const-stability equals
                         // regular stability, and regular stability is checked separately.
                         // However, we *do* have to worry about *recursive* const stability.
@@ -787,8 +790,8 @@ impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for Checker<'_, 'tcx> {
                         }
                     }
                     Some(ConstStability {
-                        feature: Some(feature),
-                        level: StabilityLevel::Unstable { implied_by: implied_feature, .. },
+                        level: StabilityLevel::Unstable { implied_by: implied_feature, issue, .. },
+                        feature,
                         ..
                     }) => {
                         // An unstable const fn with a feature gate.
@@ -810,7 +813,23 @@ impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for Checker<'_, 'tcx> {
                         // to allow this.
                         let feature_enabled = callee.is_local()
                             || tcx.features().enabled(feature)
-                            || implied_feature.is_some_and(|f| tcx.features().enabled(f));
+                            || implied_feature.is_some_and(|f| tcx.features().enabled(f))
+                            || {
+                                // When we're compiling the compiler itself we may pull in
+                                // crates from crates.io, but those crates may depend on other
+                                // crates also pulled in from crates.io. We want to ideally be
+                                // able to compile everything without requiring upstream
+                                // modifications, so in the case that this looks like a
+                                // `rustc_private` crate (e.g., a compiler crate) and we also have
+                                // the `-Z force-unstable-if-unmarked` flag present (we're
+                                // compiling a compiler crate), then let this missing feature
+                                // annotation slide.
+                                // This matches what we do in `eval_stability_allow_unstable` for
+                                // regular stability.
+                                feature == sym::rustc_private
+                                    && issue == NonZero::new(27812)
+                                    && self.tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts.force_unstable_if_unmarked
+                            };
                         // We do *not* honor this if we are in the "danger zone": we have to enforce
                         // recursive const-stability and the callee is not safe-to-expose. In that
                         // case we need `check_op` to do the check.

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/check_consts/mod.rs

@@ -53,10 +53,11 @@ impl<'mir, 'tcx> ConstCx<'mir, 'tcx> {
     }
 
     pub fn enforce_recursive_const_stability(&self) -> bool {
-        // We can skip this if `staged_api` is not enabled, since in such crates
-        // `lookup_const_stability` will always be `None`.
+        // We can skip this if neither `staged_api` nor `-Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked` are enabled,
+        // since in such crates `lookup_const_stability` will always be `None`.
         self.const_kind == Some(hir::ConstContext::ConstFn)
-            && self.tcx.features().staged_api()
+            && (self.tcx.features().staged_api()
+                || self.tcx.sess.opts.unstable_opts.force_unstable_if_unmarked)
             && is_safe_to_expose_on_stable_const_fn(self.tcx, self.def_id().to_def_id())
     }
 
@@ -109,14 +110,15 @@ pub fn is_safe_to_expose_on_stable_const_fn(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId) -> b
 
     match tcx.lookup_const_stability(def_id) {
         None => {
-            // Only marked functions can be trusted. Note that this may be a function in a
-            // non-staged-API crate where no recursive checks were done!
-            false
+            // In a `staged_api` crate, we do enforce recursive const stability for all unmarked
+            // functions, so we can trust local functions. But in another crate we don't know which
+            // rules were applied, so we can't trust that.
+            def_id.is_local() && tcx.features().staged_api()
         }
         Some(stab) => {
-            // We consider things safe-to-expose if they are stable, if they don't have any explicit
-            // const stability attribute, or if they are marked as `const_stable_indirect`.
-            stab.is_const_stable() || stab.feature.is_none() || stab.const_stable_indirect
+            // We consider things safe-to-expose if they are stable or if they are marked as
+            // `const_stable_indirect`.
+            stab.is_const_stable() || stab.const_stable_indirect
         }
     }
 }

compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs

@@ -623,12 +623,25 @@ impl Drop for DiagCtxtInner {
             self.flush_delayed()
         }
 
+        // Sanity check: did we use some of the expensive `trimmed_def_paths` functions
+        // unexpectedly, that is, without producing diagnostics? If so, for debugging purposes, we
+        // suggest where this happened and how to avoid it.
         if !self.has_printed && !self.suppressed_expected_diag && !std::thread::panicking() {
             if let Some(backtrace) = &self.must_produce_diag {
+                let suggestion = match backtrace.status() {
+                    BacktraceStatus::Disabled => String::from(
+                        "Backtraces are currently disabled: set `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` and re-run \
+                        to see where it happened.",
+                    ),
+                    BacktraceStatus::Captured => format!(
+                        "This happened in the following `must_produce_diag` call's backtrace:\n\
+                        {backtrace}",
+                    ),
+                    _ => String::from("(impossible to capture backtrace where this happened)"),
+                };
                 panic!(
-                    "must_produce_diag: `trimmed_def_paths` called but no diagnostics emitted; \
-                     `with_no_trimmed_paths` for debugging. \
-                     called at: {backtrace}"
+                    "`trimmed_def_paths` called, diagnostics were expected but none were emitted. \
+                    Use `with_no_trimmed_paths` for debugging. {suggestion}"
                 );
             }
         }

compiler/rustc_expand/src/base.rs

@@ -866,9 +866,7 @@ impl SyntaxExtension {
             })
             .unwrap_or_else(|| (None, helper_attrs));
         let stability = attr::find_stability(sess, attrs, span);
-        // We set `is_const_fn` false to avoid getting any implicit const stability.
-        let const_stability =
-            attr::find_const_stability(sess, attrs, span, /* is_const_fn */ false);
+        let const_stability = attr::find_const_stability(sess, attrs, span);
         let body_stability = attr::find_body_stability(sess, attrs);
         if let Some((_, sp)) = const_stability {
             sess.dcx().emit_err(errors::MacroConstStability {

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/messages.ftl

@@ -34,3 +34,5 @@ mir_transform_undefined_transmute = pointers cannot be transmuted to integers du
     .note = at compile-time, pointers do not have an integer value
     .note2 = avoiding this restriction via `union` or raw pointers leads to compile-time undefined behavior
     .help = for more information, see https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/mem/fn.transmute.html
+
+mir_transform_unknown_pass_name = MIR pass `{$name}` is unknown and will be ignored

compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/errors.rs

@@ -38,6 +38,12 @@ pub(crate) struct UnalignedPackedRef {
     pub span: Span,
 }
 
+#[derive(Diagnostic)]
+#[diag(mir_transform_unknown_pass_name)]
+pub(crate) struct UnknownPassName<'a> {
+    pub(crate) name: &'a str,
+}
+
 pub(crate) struct AssertLint<P> {
     pub span: Span,
     pub assert_kind: AssertKind<P>,