fix a few links#214
Conversation
nikomatsakis
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd rather we figure out the linkifer bug. Or maybe those were disabled because the impl was so crappy, I remember @joshtriplett complaining about it.
| * convene Rust maintainers to celebrate Rust's tenth birthday at [RustWeek 2025](https://2025.rustweek.org) (co-organized with [RustNL](https://2025.rustweek.org/about/); | ||
| * author a first draft for a [Rust vision doc](./rust-vision-doc.md) and gather feedback. | ||
|
|
||
| [RFC 3716]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3716 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Doesn't that only parse RFC #3716, not RFC 3716?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I assume it should be RFC #?([0-9]+) if we want to allow both.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Doesn't that only parse
RFC #3716, notRFC 3716?
it was RFC #3716 in the original text, which causes even more confusion as to why it didn't work
Sure, I will try to find out. |
|
The linkifier is not disabled locally and seems to work, but these links were using the incorrect micro-syntax: the linkifier doesn't trigger on I've updated the PR to restore and fix the original text. |
|
Thanks @lqd ! |
fix a few links
The post-processor didn't linkify the RFC link from last time, so here is the PR I promised.
There was also a couple other links to fix in the RFL page.
Rendered