Skip to content

Add missing space when expanding a struct-like variant #15096

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2025

Conversation

samueltardieu
Copy link
Contributor

In wildcard_enum_match_arm, expanding a variant with struct-like fields was missing a space between the variant name and the opening bracket.

Also, add a test for tuple-like variants with only one field, as those are expanded as VariantName(_) instead of VariantName(..).

changelog: none

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 21, 2025

r? @y21

rustbot has assigned @y21.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 21, 2025
In `wildcard_enum_match_arm`, expanding a variant with struct-like
fields was missing a space between the variant name and the opening
bracket.

Also, add a test for tuple-like variants with only one field, as those
are expanded as `VariantName(_)` instead of `VariantName(..)`.
@samueltardieu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased (I just merged another change done to the same files).

@y21 y21 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 76118ec Jun 21, 2025
11 checks passed
@samueltardieu samueltardieu deleted the variant-print branch June 21, 2025 19:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants