Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: skipping users events for snowpipe streaming #3836

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

achettyiitr
Copy link
Member

What are the changes introduced in this PR?

  • Skipping users events for Snowpipe streaming destination.

What is the related Linear task?

  • Resolves PIPE-1690

@achettyiitr achettyiitr requested review from a team as code owners October 30, 2024 05:28
@achettyiitr achettyiitr changed the title fix: snowpipe streaming users table skipping fix: skipping users events for snowpipe streaming Oct 30, 2024
@devops-github-rudderstack
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.48%. Comparing base (275e971) to head (2e13447).
Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3836   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    90.47%   90.48%           
========================================
  Files          615      615           
  Lines        32320    32341   +21     
  Branches      7677     7690   +13     
========================================
+ Hits         29242    29263   +21     
  Misses        2822     2822           
  Partials       256      256           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants