-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFC9586 UIDONLY support #366
Open
avdi
wants to merge
13
commits into
ruby:master
Choose a base branch
from
avdi:RFC9586-UIDONLY
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is accomplished by making UIDFetchData subclass FetchData. I instinctively prefer to extact a module or a shared superclass and put all of the accessor methods on that. I did it this way in order to preserve the attribute accessor rdoc on FetchData. But it feels wrong to me that UIDFetchData is subclassing FetchData: * It's a small violation of Liskov's Substitution Principle, for #seqno (and, to a lesser extent, #uid). * Any case statements or pattern matching that are looking for FetchData will also match UIDFetchData, which may not be correct. It also complicates matching only UIDFetchData, because you need to ensure that when/in UIDFetchData comes before any when/in FetchData. On the other hand, it's probably a good thing that FetchData#=== matches UIDFetchData too. Other than #seqno (which is prohibited by `UIDONLY`) any code that works for FetchData today should work with UIDFetchData.
This way, we can get the correct Struct field names for both classes, without needing to undef, alias, etc. It also fixes Struct methods like `to_h` and `deconstruct_keys`.
This reduces duplication between `fetch_internal` and `store_internal`.
nevans
force-pushed
the
RFC9586-UIDONLY
branch
from
January 3, 2025 15:06
ef70251
to
dcbef82
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
AKA "UI donly", apparently.