Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for RoadRunner v2024.1 #38

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

Add support for RoadRunner v2024.1 #38

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

msmakouz
Copy link
Member

@msmakouz msmakouz commented Apr 11, 2024

Q A
Bugfix?
Breaks BC?
New feature?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the version constraint for the "spiral/roadrunner" package to support both 2023.1 and 2024.1 versions.

@msmakouz msmakouz self-assigned this Apr 11, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 11, 2024

Walkthrough

This update primarily modifies the dependency version in the composer.json file to accommodate newer versions of the "spiral/roadrunner" package. The version constraint has been expanded to include both "^2023.1" and "^2024.1", ensuring compatibility with the latest release while maintaining support for the previous version.

Changes

File Change Summary
composer.json Updated "spiral/roadrunner" version to "^2023.1

🐇💻✨
Oh, hark! A change does come,
In composer.json, not some,
"spiral/roadrunner" runs,
From '23 to '24, it spans,
CodeRabbit hops with glee,
For compatibility, you see! 🌟📦


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 203917d and 42bc507.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • composer.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
composer.json (1)

51-51: The update to the version constraint for "spiral/roadrunner" looks good and should enable compatibility with both RoadRunner 2023.1 and 2024.1.

Verification successful

The analysis of the composer.json file indicates that there are no obvious conflicts between the updated "spiral/roadrunner" version constraint ("^2023.1 || ^2024.1") and other declared dependencies. The dependencies directly related to "spiral/roadrunner" have their own version constraints that do not suggest any compatibility issues based on the information available. However, the absence of a composer.lock file means that we cannot verify the exact versions of the dependencies installed, which would be necessary for a definitive compatibility check.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that no other dependencies have conflicts with the new RoadRunner version.
composer show --tree | grep 'spiral/roadrunner'

Length of output: 123



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if composer.json and composer.lock exist and list their contents
if [ -f composer.json ]; then
    echo "composer.json exists:"
    cat composer.json
else
    echo "composer.json does not exist"
fi

if [ -f composer.lock ]; then
    echo "composer.lock exists:"
    cat composer.lock
else
    echo "composer.lock does not exist"
fi

Length of output: 2512


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@msmakouz msmakouz merged commit 5abd8c0 into 4.x Apr 12, 2024
4 checks passed
@msmakouz msmakouz deleted the rr-2024-support branch April 12, 2024 08:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants