"Note Codes" vs. "Note Names"

[ahankinson]

Decide on the standard terminology for notes.

From #67

[ahankinson]

I have been considering this issue.

I think it's implicit that all the sections give the "code"; that is, you could apply the terminology "Accidental codes" or "Octave codes" to the other section. I think "Notes" on its own is not sufficient, because all the parameters combine to give a "note code" (octave, accidental, name), so this section is actually "Note name codes", since it specifically refers to the part of the note code that provides the note name. (To be more specific, this is actually "Pitch class codes" but I think "Note names" is clearer to a general audience.)

In the spirit of optimizing the terminology, "Accidental codes" -> "Accidentals", "Octave codes" -> "Octaves", and "Note name codes" -> "Note names".

So I think for now I would prefer to keep it as "Note names", since this section is specifically about naming the pitch class, not the whole "Note code".

Please re-open with any differing opinions.