Skip to content

Support static filter pushdown through remote scanner #3795

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Support static filter pushdown through remote scanner #3795

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+411 −41

Conversation

@jackkleeman
Copy link
Contributor

@jackkleeman jackkleeman commented Sep 15, 2025

No description provided.

@jackkleeman jackkleeman force-pushed the push-xvktpzymtomz branch 2 times, most recently from 75c99dc to 5ea04be Compare September 15, 2025 14:22
igalshilman
igalshilman reviewed Sep 15, 2025
View reviewed changes
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 15, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Test Results

  7 files  ± 0    7 suites  ±0   4m 49s ⏱️ + 1m 6s
 49 tests  -  5   49 ✅  -  4  0 💤  - 1  0 ❌ ±0 
210 runs   - 13  210 ✅  - 10  0 💤  - 3  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit e8b0b64. ± Comparison against base commit b38521b.

This pull request removes 6 and adds 1 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both. 
dev.restate.sdktesting.tests.Ingress ‑ idempotentInvokeSend(Client)
dev.restate.sdktesting.tests.Ingress ‑ idempotentInvokeService(Client)
dev.restate.sdktesting.tests.Ingress ‑ idempotentInvokeVirtualObject(URI, Client)
dev.restate.sdktesting.tests.Ingress ‑ idempotentSendThenAttach(Client)
dev.restate.sdktesting.tests.Ingress ‑ idempotentSendThenAttachWIthIdempotencyKey(Client)
dev.restate.sdktesting.tests.PrivateService ‑ privateService(URI, Client)

dev.restate.sdktesting.tests.RunRetry ‑ executedOnlyOnce(Client)

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@jackkleeman jackkleeman force-pushed the push-xvktpzymtomz branch 2 times, most recently from f22145c to 4b6ec85 Compare September 15, 2025 19:49
@jackkleeman
Copy link
Contributor Author

jackkleeman commented Sep 15, 2025

datafusion-proto includes a bunch of features from datafusion we dont want, probably need to fix this upstream or fork it

@jackkleeman jackkleeman force-pushed the push-xvktpzymtomz branch 2 times, most recently from e8b0b64 to 730c0c8 Compare September 22, 2025 18:13
@jackkleeman jackkleeman changed the base branch from main to push-nztzrprqyzkm September 22, 2025 18:14
Base automatically changed from push-nztzrprqyzkm to main September 23, 2025 07:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@igalshilman igalshilman igalshilman approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jackkleeman @igalshilman