feat(server): Update user role with maintainer #73
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request modifies two components. In the account interactor's Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant C as Caller
participant R as Run3 Function
C->>R: Call Run3()
R-->>C: Return result (without transaction/permission checks)
sequenceDiagram
participant C as Caller
participant O as Operator
C->>O: Call AllOwningWorkspaces()
O->>O: Concatenate OwningWorkspaces + MaintainableWorkspaces
O-->>C: Return combined workspace list
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
account/accountusecase/accountinteractor/usecase.go(0 hunks)account/accountusecase/operator.go(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- account/accountusecase/accountinteractor/usecase.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: CI
🔇 Additional comments (1)
account/accountusecase/operator.go (1)
61-62: LGTM!The parameter renaming from
workspacetowsimproves naming consistency with other methods in the file.
| func (o *Operator) AllOwningWorkspaces() accountdomain.WorkspaceIDList { | ||
| return o.OwningWorkspaces | ||
| return o.OwningWorkspaces.Concat(o.MaintainableWorkspaces) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security concern: Maintainers gain owner-level access.
The change to AllOwningWorkspaces treats maintainers as owners by concatenating MaintainableWorkspaces with OwningWorkspaces. This workaround:
- Violates the role separation principle by giving maintainers owner-level access.
- Deviates from the "User Role System" document specifications.
- May lead to unintended access escalation through the role hierarchy chain.
Consider implementing a proper fix by:
- Using
WithMaintainableWorkspaces()where needed. - Updating permission checks to respect maintainer roles.
The maintainer user cannot update roles.
Currently, only WithOwnableWorkspaces() is being used, and WithMaintainableWorkspaces() is not called from anywhere.
The maintainableWorkspaces field in uc is not referenced anywhere.
This means that if a user has the "maintainer" role, they are not granted any permissions and will always receive "operation denied" errors.
To temporarily work around this issue, we can treat maintainers as equivalent to owners by modifying:
However, this does not comply with the specifications described in the following document:
User Role System
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores