Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ui): socket yjs manager & refactor #649
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix(ui): socket yjs manager & refactor #649
Changes from 4 commits
981c67d
c1cc871
e855eb4
a8cbafe
a14faa0
7a606b0
b636507
839ad71
0eb3ea1
596f47c
9055fa2
c08e26d
1db64b0
87fc1a4
53ea438
06f2268
d452e3e
247877e
3940df9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Make required fields non-optional or add proper null checks.
The
accessTokenProvider
andprojectId
fields are marked as optional but are used throughout the code without proper null checks. This could lead to runtime errors.Apply this diff:
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider revising field visibility and optional types
The class has several issues in its field declarations:
accessTokenProvider
andprojectId
) are used throughout the code without proper null checksConsider this improvement:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add URL protocol validation
The URL protocol replacement assumes HTTP/HTTPS protocols. Add validation to ensure only supported protocols are processed.
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security: Avoid exposing sensitive data in URL parameters
The WebSocket URL includes sensitive information (user_id, project_id, token) as query parameters, which can be logged or exposed in various ways. Consider using headers or a more secure authentication mechanism.
Consider:
Apply this diff as a starting point:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pyshx Long term this is better probably. Make sure to look at this suggestion.
coderabbitai, I don't need you to do anything or reply.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security: Move sensitive data from URL parameters to headers.
Exposing sensitive information like tokens and IDs in URL parameters is a security risk as they can be logged or exposed in various ways.
Consider using a secure WebSocket handshake protocol or moving authentication to a dedicated message after connection.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add connection timeout handling
The WebSocket connection attempt lacks a timeout, which could leave the application hanging if the server is unresponsive.
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling in setupSocket
The error handling could be more specific and provide better context for debugging.
Consider this improvement:
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add input validation for setupSocket parameters
The method lacks validation for required parameters. URL construction should be more robust.
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Avoid silent failures with empty projectId
Using empty strings as fallbacks for required parameters could lead to silent failures.
Consider throwing an error instead:
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add connection cleanup before reconnection
The reconnection attempt should clean up the existing connection before establishing a new one.
Consider this improvement:
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add WebSocket cleanup before reconnection
The reconnection attempt should properly close and clean up the existing WebSocket connection before creating a new one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add connection state tracking
The reconnection logic could benefit from explicit state tracking to prevent race conditions and multiple simultaneous reconnection attempts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add cleanup for doc listeners
The document update listener is not removed when the instance is destroyed, which could lead to memory leaks.
Add cleanup in the destroy method:
And in the destroy method:
destroy() { + this.cleanupDocListeners(); if (this.reconnectTimer) {
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error event typing
The error event parameter should use the specific
ErrorEvent
type instead of the genericEvent
type.📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add binary message validation
The binary message handling lacks validation of the message format and size.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add explicit error handling for JSON parsing
The JSON parsing could fail with invalid data, and the error should be handled explicitly.
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling in message processing
The error handling in handleMessage could be more specific and provide better context.
Consider this improvement:
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add specific error handling for room initialization steps
The error handling in initializeRoom could be more granular to identify which step failed.
Consider this improvement:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add timeout to sendFlowMessage
The sendFlowMessage method should include a timeout to prevent hanging operations.
Consider this improvement:
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for update handlers
The update handler execution doesn't handle errors, which could prevent subsequent handlers from running.
📝 Committable suggestion