feat: Support Reactive Routes

[angelozerr]

feat: Support Reactive Routes

Fixes #1114

[fbricon]

we should have unit tests for that

[angelozerr]

we should have unit tests for that

Yes sure. I have implemented quickly the support and now I need to clean my code and write tests.

@gastaldi here the result:

• classic usecase:

• routebase usecase:

• mutiple route usecase:

[angelozerr]

My code is clean now, I need to write tests but @fbricon @gastaldi you can start to review it

[fbricon]

• mutiple route usecase:

I wonder if we should have 1 URL per line. How many different routes can a user add, realistically? @gastaldi WDYT?

[gastaldi]

@fbricon in my experience, a single @Route is enough per method

[angelozerr]

I support now implicit usage when a method is annotated with Route:

[angelozerr]

I wonder if we should have 1 URL per line. How many different routes can a user add, realistically? @gastaldi WDYT?

I fear that we takes some times to do implement that for few usages. if you want to have that really, we could do that in a separate PR.

[angelozerr]

Now tests exist.

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.0% Duplication

[fbricon]

Thanks @angelozerr