-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix bug with resource data offset in FreeSpaceModifier
introduced in #505
#569
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for catching this. Please see my suggestions -- they mainly revolve around making this test case a little easier to understand.
While I agree that this doesn't require a separate change log entry, i wonder if we should update the existing one to list both 505 and 509? @rbs-jacob, we should probably have a standard approach to things like this.
I'm in favor of standardizing on listing all relevant PRs for a changelog entry. I'll make a PR that updates the contributor guidelines accordingly to codify this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@alchzh, per #569 (comment), can you update the CHANGELOG to list this PR in addition to 505?
Other than that this looks good to me, feel free to merge in once the CHANGELOG is updated and you are ready.
One sentence summary of this PR (This should go in the CHANGELOG!)
Fix bug with resource data offset in free_space.py introduced in #505. (No changelog necessary, fixes a bug recently introduced)
Link to Related Issue(s)
Please describe the changes in your request.
(await resource.get_data_range_within_parent()).start
was accidentally replaced with(await parent.get_data_range_within_parent()).start
inFreeSpaceModifier
Anyone you think should look at this, specifically?