Skip to content

A set of utilities for running few-shot prompting experiments on large-language models

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

reasoning-machines/prompt-lib

Repository files navigation

Prompt-lib

  • A library for hassle-free few-shot prompting.

TLDR: This library makes it easy to write prompts for few-shot prompting tasks. It includes rate-limiting and retry logic, and makes it easy to write prompts for different tasks.

  • To get started, run:
export OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
python prompt_lib/run_inference.py --task_id boolsimplify_stream --num_prompt_examples -1 --name boolsimplify_stream_code-davinci-002_s1 --model_name code-davinci-002 --max_tokens 600 --seed 1 --num_questions_per_thread 500 --temperature 0.0 --num_inference_examples 3 --cot_task --is_debug
  • The outputs are stored in data/logs/boolsimplify_stream/code-davinci-002/temp_0.0/seed_1/k_all/

News 📢

[Aug 2023] Added support for Together.ai API.

[June 2023] Added support for claude series of models from Anthropic.

[Mar 2023] prompt-lib now works with ChatGPT/GPT-4. The addition is backward compatible, so you can simply usegpt-3.5-turbo or gpt-4 as the engine name. However, you may want to checkout how we convert the prompt to messages here.

Colabs

You can run these colabs directly in the browser. Supporting bulk-inference is the main goal of prompt-lib, but these notebooks should give you a good idea of some of the functionality.

If your goal is not to do bulk inference (typically required for research papers/benchmarking), we recommend checking out https://langchain.readthedocs.io/.

Running on a custom task

prompt-lib comes with a large number of tasks. To register a new task, please follow these instructions:

Step 1: Defining a custom task

  • To begin we need a prompt. A prompt is a list of examples, where each example is an instantiation of the following:
@dataclass
class Example:
    question: str
    answer: str
    thought: str
  • The question is the input to the model, the answer is the expected output, and the thought is an intermediate reasoning step. The thought is optional, and can be left as an empty string if not needed (for direct prompting for example).

  • Let us define a prompt for the task of boolean expression simplification. The following is a list of examples for this task:

[
    Example(
        question="!a & a & (a ^ c & d | !b)",
        answer="false",
        thought="false & expr is false",
    ),
    Example(
        question="a & b | a & c",
        answer="a & (b | c)",
        thought="a & (b | c) is the same as a & b | a & c",
    ),
    Example(
        question="a & b | a & b",
        answer="a & b",
        thought="expr | expr is the same as expr",
    ),
    Example(
        question="(a | !a) | ((b & !c | c & !b) & (a | !a) | (b & !c | c & !b))",
        answer="true",
        thought="true | expr is true",
    ),
]
  • The prompt can be added to any python file in scope, but for the sake of this example, we will add it to prompts/boolsimplify/boolsimplify.py. Typically, you will try multiple variations of a prompt for a task. To keep things manageable, we add a dictionary at the end of prompts/boolsimplify/boolsimplify.py that gives a task_id to each prompt:
 bool_simple_taskid_to_prompt = {
    "boolsimplify_stream": bool_simple_examples
}
  • Note the id we give to our task: boolsimplify_stream. By convention, task_ids have two parts: {dataset}_{prompt_type}. Here, the dataset is boolsimplify and the prompt_type is stream. This is important: we expect dataset.jsonl to be present in data/tasks/

Text-file based prompt:

  • For many use cases, you may not want to define a prompt in a text file. This is easily done by specifying a path in bool_simple_taskid_to_prompt:
 bool_simple_taskid_to_prompt = {
    "boolsimplify_txt": "prompts/boolsimplify/boolsimplify.txt"
}
  • All the steps below remain the same. When running a job, you need to specify boolsimplify_txt as the task_id.

Step 2: Registering the task

  • The next step is to register the task. The file task_id_to_prompt maintains a global dictionary that maps task_ids to prompts. We can add our task to this dictionary by adding the following line to task_id_to_prompt:
from prompt_lib.prompts.boolsimplify import boolsimplify_taskid_to_prompt

task_id_to_prompt.update(bool_simple_taskid_to_prompt)
  • The task is now registered, and can be used to run a custom task.

Step 3: Defining inputs/outputs

  • We want to evaluate the model on some test file, and thus we need a file with inputs and expected outputs. The file data/tasks/boolsimplify.jsonl contains the inputs and outputs for the boolsimplify dataset. The file is a jsonl, and each line is a json object with the following keys:
{
    "input": "a & b | a & c",
    "target": "a & (b | c)",
}
  • A simple task file with 5 lines has been added to data/tasks/boolsimplify.jsonl for this example. You can add more lines to this file to evaluate the model on more examples.

Step 4: Running the task

  • Now that the task is registered, and the inputs/outputs are defined, we can run the task. The following command will run the task:

  • Export your openai api key to the environment variable OPENAI_API_KEY:

export OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
bash scripts/run_single_task.sh boolsimplify_stream
  • The outputs are stored in data/logs/boolsimplify_stream/

Structure of a prompt

  • We highly recommend reading this document to understand the structure of a prompt better.

Additional notes

  • If you are using text prompts, seeds are not supported. Instead, you can use 'scripts/shuffle_prompt.py' to create a shuffled version of the prompt.
python prompt-lib/scripts/shuffle_prompt.py --prompt_path quco_prompts/gsm/function_with_comments.txt --seeds 1 2 3 --example_sep $'\n\n\n'

(note the $'\n\n\n' to separate examples--this is needed for passing newlines to the script)

Custom Evaluation

  • You can also run custom evaluation scripts. This is highly recommended. If you are running a large number of prompt variations, consider writing the custom evaluation function in scripts/eval.py, and then passing it as an argument --eval_function. Combined with wandb, this can be a powerful way to track the performance of your prompts without having to track the outputs of each prompt variation.

Multiple outputs

  • You can specify --num_completions to get multiple outputs. The output file is stored in the same location, with an extra field generated_answers that is a list of outputs. The generated_answer field is still present, and is the first element of generated_answers.

For example:

python3 prompt_lib/run_inference.py --task_id boolsimplify_stream --num_prompt_examples -1 --name boolsimplify_stream_code-davinci-002_s1 --model_name code-davinci-002 --max_tokens 600 --seed 1 --num_questions_per_thread 500 --temperature 0.9 --num_inference_examples 3 --cot_task --is_debug --num_completions 3

Generates an output file data/logs/boolsimplify_stream/code-davinci-002/temp_0.9/seed_1/k_all/2023-01-02_10-16-39/outputs.jsonl (the timestamp will be different). One entry in the file is:

{
    "prompt": "Q: a & b | a & c\nA: a & (b | c) is the same as a & b | a & c The answer is a & (b | c)\n\n\nQ: a & b | a & b\nA: expr | expr is the same as expr The answer is a & b\n\n\nQ: !a & a & (a ^ c & d | !b)\nA: false & expr is false The answer is false\n\n\nQ: (a | !a) | ((b & !c | c & !b) & (a | !a) | (b & !c | c & !b))\nA: true | expr is true The answer is true",
    "question": "\nQ: a & b | a & b\nA: ",
    "answer": "a & b",
    "generated_answers": [
        "expr | expr is the same as expr The answer is a & b",
        "expr | expr is the same as expr The answer is a & b",
        "!b & a is the same as a & !b The answer is !b & a"
    ],
    "generated_answer": "expr | expr is the same as expr The answer is a & b",
    "is_correct": 1
}

TODOs:

  • Allow formatting functions to be used for creating a prompt dynamically. Currently, prompts are created either by reading from a file or by using prefixes for question/answer. This excludes use cases like https://github.com/reasoning-machines/CoCoGen

  • Cache previous outputs in a memory during a run.

  • Add example of using --cached_timestamp

About

A set of utilities for running few-shot prompting experiments on large-language models

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published