chore: comment out ismp

[Daanvdplas]

In order to uplift pop to stable 2412 the ismp related code will be commented out. This is because the ismp dependencies are currently at 2407 and there is no eta when they will do those upgrades. In the meantime we can proceed with the upgrades and relevant work depending on this.

As for the messaging feature that is in the pipeline, I created a branch from main: feat/messaging. This branch is on v1.14 with ismp still in the devnet runtime.

Before reviewing, see latest commit for something that was required to make zepter happy.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 68 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.37%. Comparing base (3476994) to head (855146b).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
runtime/devnet/src/lib.rs	0.00%	61 Missing ⚠️
node/src/chain_spec.rs	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
node/src/service.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #414      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.41%   68.37%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          70       69       -1     
  Lines       11838    11845       +7     
  Branches    11838    11845       +7     
==========================================
  Hits         8099     8099              
- Misses       3482     3489       +7     
  Partials      257      257              

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
node/src/command.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
node/src/rpc.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
node/src/service.rs	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
node/src/chain_spec.rs	9.53% <0.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
runtime/devnet/src/lib.rs	5.53% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[peterwht]

before approving this, I think it's worthwhile to see if we can revert back to our ISMP fork and update that repo as well. In the past it's been smooth with only PSVM being required.

See this commit: r0gue-io/ismp@46862a0

IMPORTANT NOTE:

The ISMP repo will NOT build standalone. You will verify its compilation through building pop-node with the ISMP modules pointing to your new ISMP branch. This is because we are only using the ISMP pallet.

[chungquantin]

If everything related to ISMP removed, why don't we fork main branch to ismp, create a PR and then remove everything related to ismp in main. This avoid leaving all the commented-out code in everywhere in the file.

Edit: Saw you removed review requests, I'll leave my comments here anyway.

[chungquantin]

Since this has been merged into main, it's worth leaving clear TODOs for the commented-out code.