-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
Speed up is_installed()
- shortcut when package is already loaded
#1804
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
eitsupi
wants to merge
1
commit into
r-lib:main
Choose a base branch
from
eitsupi:fast-is_installed
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a typical intended interface?
is_installed(list("dplyr", "dbplyr"))
If not, we can move the checks "outside the loop" toget early exits for any of the
!is.character(pkg)
and!all(nzchar(pkg))
cases.Next, why use
is.environment(.getNamespace(x))
instead ofisNamespaceLoaded(x)
? The former is described as an "internal" (hence the leading.
), the latter is more readable (and nanosecond-scale-faster).Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The argument is expected to be a character vector
c("dplyr", "dbplyr")
rather than a list, so your suggestion would work well in that case. A list would just fail the fast path but continue, so is not disastrous.If we make the change here, we should do the same at
check_installed()
.Thanks for the suggestion of
isNamespaceLoaded(x)
. It is indeed faster as it shares the same C level code path as.getNamespace(x)
but just returns a logical value rather than the environment itself.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MichaelChirico sorry somehow I missed your entire code suggestion, so my inital reply was totally off the mark (now amended above).
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the suggestions!
Would it be better to refactor this with
check_installed
after merging this since my intention of this PR is just to bring the same changes here ascheck_installed
in #1780?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes that's fine thanks! If Lionel adopts the suggestion here, I will follow up with the corresponding change to
check_installed()
.