Skip to content

Addition of LCOH industry transformation #3189

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kaskranenburgQ
Copy link
Contributor

@kaskranenburgQ kaskranenburgQ commented Jan 20, 2025

This PR adds queries to calculate the LCOH that is produced by the industry tranformation nodes.
The LCOH is calculated by using the variable costs of the node and attributing this to the output of hydrogen while correcting for losses.

Wih this, the hydrogen production curve does no longer need to be corrected for the output of industry transformation.
This has been changed in the queries for this graph.

In addition, the hydrogen LCOH cost export has been altered to include the industry transformation nodes.

Goes together with:
quintel/etmodel#4393

@kaskranenburgQ kaskranenburgQ changed the title Cost industry transformation hydrogen Addition of LCOH industry transformation Jan 20, 2025
Copy link

This pull request has had no activity for 60 days and will be closed in 7 days. Removing the "Stale" label or posting a comment will prevent it from being closed automatically. You can also add the "Pinned" label to ensure it isn't marked as stale in the future.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale Issue had no activity for 60 days and will be, or has been, closed. label Mar 22, 2025
@kndehaan kndehaan added Pinned Will never be marked as stale or auto-closed. and removed Stale Issue had no activity for 60 days and will be, or has been, closed. labels Apr 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Pinned Will never be marked as stale or auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants