[docs]: add shared doc of llgo

[1351914167]

No description provided.

[niupilot]

🔍 PR Review: LLGo Documentation

Todo List:

• Gather context and read the modified documentation file
• Analyze content for documentation quality and technical accuracy
• Provide comprehensive review feedback
• Submit final review

Review Summary

This PR adds comprehensive documentation explaining LLGo's Python compilation and runtime integration process. The content is well-structured and provides valuable technical insights into how LLGo handles Python dependencies, compilation, linking, and bundling.

Strengths

1. Comprehensive Coverage: The document thoroughly covers the entire Python integration pipeline from dependency detection to final packaging
2. Clear Structure: Well-organized sections with logical flow from high-level concepts to implementation details
3. Code Examples: Includes relevant Go code snippets that illustrate key concepts
4. Practical Value: Explains both the technical implementation and the practical benefits for end users
5. Comparative Analysis: Good comparison between C/C++ and Python integration approaches

Issues and Suggestions

Critical Issues

1. Code Reference Format Inconsistency (Line 27):

   ```418:424:llgo/internal/build/build.go
   

   This format mixing line numbers with file path is non-standard. Consider using either:

   • Standard markdown: ````go` // from llgo/internal/build/build.go:418-424```
   • Or separate the reference: "From llgo/internal/build/build.go lines 418-424:"

2. Missing Newline at End (Line 166):
   The file ends without a final newline character, which violates POSIX standards and may cause issues with some tools.

Documentation Quality Issues

3. Hard-coded Version References (Line 78):

   inc := filepath.Join(pyenv.PythonHome(), "include", "python3.12")

   The documentation hard-codes Python 3.12, which may become outdated. Consider using a placeholder like python3.x or explaining the version detection mechanism.

4. Incomplete Code Snippets (Lines 31-34):

   case cl.PkgLinkIR, cl.PkgLinkExtern, cl.PkgPyModule:
       // ... 见下文

   The comment "见下文" (see below) is vague. Either expand the code example or provide a more specific reference.

5. Inconsistent Comment Style:

   • Line 72: Uses out := tmp.Name() + ".o" with inline comments
   • Line 107: Uses // <exe_dir>/python/lib/... with block comments
     Standardize comment placement and style throughout.

Technical Accuracy Concerns

6. macOS-Specific Commands (Line 119):

   _ = exec.Command("install_name_tool", "-id", "@rpath/"+filepath.Base(libDst), libDst).Run()

   The error is explicitly ignored with _. Documentation should explain why error handling is omitted or if this is a simplification.

7. Incomplete Function Signatures (Lines 109, 124):
   Functions like BundleOnedir and BuildOnefileBinary show incomplete implementations. Consider either:

   • Providing complete examples
   • Clearly marking them as simplified/pseudo-code
   • Referencing actual source locations

Presentation Issues

8. Mixed Language Content: While the technical content is excellent, consider adding English abstracts for key sections to improve accessibility for international contributors.

9. Section Balance: The "一眼看懂的调用顺序" (Call Sequence) section is quite brief compared to others and could benefit from more detail or visual representation.

Recommendations

1. Fix the code reference format on line 27
2. Add final newline to the file
3. Use version placeholders instead of hard-coded Python versions
4. Expand incomplete code examples or mark them clearly as simplified
5. Standardize comment formatting throughout code blocks
6. Add error handling explanations where errors are ignored
7. Consider adding a glossary for technical terms like SSA/IR, rpath, etc.

Overall Assessment

This is a valuable addition to the documentation that provides deep technical insights into LLGo's Python integration. The content demonstrates strong understanding of the system architecture and will be helpful for developers working with LLGo. With the suggested improvements, this documentation will be even more effective.

The technical approach described is sound, and the step-by-step explanation makes complex integration concepts accessible. The comparison between C/C++ and Python handling is particularly insightful.

👉 Want me to re-run this review? Just type /review in the comments! For more usage examples, visit CodeAgent GitHub Repository.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @1351914167, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

此拉取请求新增了一份详细的文档，阐述了 LLGo（一个基于 LLVM 的 Go 编译器）如何实现 Python 编译与运行时的深度集成。该文档全面覆盖了从识别 Python 依赖到将带有 Python 能力的应用程序打包以便于分发的整个流程，确保用户无需预先安装 Python 环境即可运行 LLGo 编译的应用程序。同时，它也对比了 Python 与 C/C++ 在 LLGo 中的集成方式。

Highlights

• LLGo 中 Python 编译与运行时集成: 详细阐述了 LLGo 如何集成 Python 的编译与运行时，涵盖了依赖识别、链接和初始化等关键环节。
• 打包能力 (Bundle): 介绍了 LLGo 的 bundle 功能，允许将 Python 与应用程序一起打包，实现“拿来就跑”的部署，提供了目录式和单文件自解压两种形式。
• 与 C/C++ 的对比: 强调了 LLGo 在处理 C/C++ 和 Python 依赖时的异同，特别是在运行时初始化和环境准备方面的差异。
• 详细构建流程: 概述了 LLGo 中 Python 集成的关键构建步骤，包括预构建环境准备、链接阶段的注入和 rpath 处理。

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

这篇关于 LLGo 中 Python 编译与运行时集成的文档内容详实，结构清晰，对理解相关技术细节非常有帮助。我提出了一些小的修改建议，主要涉及 Markdown 代码块的语法高亮和个别术语的表达，以提升文档的可读性和专业性。总体来说，这是一份高质量的技术分享文档。

[niupilot]

Code Quality Review

Found several formatting and documentation consistency issues that should be addressed:

• Code reference format inconsistency - Non-standard markdown format mixing line numbers with file paths
• Missing final newline - File doesn't end with newline (POSIX standard violation)
• Hard-coded version references - Python version should be generalized for future compatibility
• Incomplete code examples - Vague placeholder comments need improvement

[Nliver]

LGTM.