Skip to content

Conversation

@lizgehret
Copy link
Member

@lizgehret lizgehret commented Nov 26, 2025

This PR does the following:

  1. Renames all instances of the amplicon distro to qiime2
  2. Updates all qiime2 variable names to rachis

Note that the following external changes have also been made to accompany this PR:

  • A new quay.io org has been created for rachis, and the relevant repos (qiime2, moshpit, pathogenome, tiny) have been created as well (they are currently empty).
  • A new subdir under 2026.1 (on packages.qiime2.org) has been created for qiime2. The amplicon subdir has been left as-is so that prepares for this weekend can run uninterrupted.

Paired ALP PR: qiime2/action-library-packaging#58

@lizgehret
Copy link
Member Author

Another note: this PR will fail, not for any interesting reason (bc multiple distros are being updated at once).

I wanted to do all of this at once to keep things isolated to one PR. We will inevitably need to see if anything breaks once this gets merged, but my hope is that if this gets done all at once early on in our development cycle there will be plenty of time to fix it before the 2026.1 release.

rebuilt-channel-key: ${{ needs.prepare.outputs.rebuilt-channel-key }}
patched-channel-key: ${{ needs.prepare.outputs.patched-channel-key }}
distro-name: qiime2-${{ needs.prepare.outputs.distro }}
distro-name: rachis-${{ needs.prepare.outputs.distro }}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Irrespective of the final distro name, I wonder if we should pull the prefix out entirely?

This would take a lot to do though, since it has unfortunately accreted a lot of dependencies (3rd party actions, library, etc). But I've been kind of unhappy with the prefix for a while. (e.g. "moshpit" should just be "moshpit", so in that sense, "rachis" is more neutral, but I wonder if we want this going into the future.)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(for posterity, we already discussed on basecamp- but adding here as well)

yeah i think the amount of dependencies we have on the env file name structure makes the removal of the prefix more involved than just a simple swap. while i do think the cleanest outcome would be -etc without any prefix, i'm not sure if the juice is worth the squeeze. mainly bc i think rachis--etc conveys that this environment file uses rachis as the base, which makes it pretty clear where this is coming from.

image: ${{ steps.build-galaxy-image.outputs.image }}
tags: ${{ steps.build-galaxy-image.outputs.tags }}
registry: quay.io/qiime2
registry: quay.io/rachis
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will break our tools repo and q2galaxy since they expect it from qiime2.

image: ${{ steps.build-workshop-image.outputs.image }}
tags: ${{ steps.build-workshop-image.outputs.tags }}
registry: quay.io/qiime2
registry: quay.io/rachis
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should dual-publish for a little bit, so that there is time to migrate.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
channels:
- https://packages.qiime2.org/qiime2/2026.1/amplicon/passed
- https://packages.qiime2.org/qiime2/2026.1/qiime2/passed
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we symlink the first qiime2 in this URL to rachis?

- https://packages.qiime2.org/rachis/2026.1/qiime2/passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants