-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support my PEP 649 branch #412
Conversation
src/test_typing_extensions.py
Outdated
try: | ||
__annotations__[1] = 2 | ||
except NameError: | ||
pass # 3.14+ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe add an assert system.version >= (3, 14)
inside the except
block?
if "__annotations__" in ns: | ||
own_annotations = ns["__annotations__"] | ||
elif "__annotate__" in ns: | ||
# TODO: Use inspect.VALUE here, and make the annotations lazily evaluated | ||
own_annotations = ns["__annotate__"](1) | ||
else: | ||
own_annotations = {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mentioned in python/cpython#119361 (comment) that you'd be adding a helper function for this kind of thing at some point -- would it be worth waiting for that, since the first 3.14 alpha is some way off?
I can also see the advantages of getting typing_extensions
working with your branch, though, so that you can start testing with the rest of the ecosystem that depends on typing_extensions
. So I definitely don't want to block you merging this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do expect we'll need more changes later, but it's helpful to get this merged so I can test the rest of the ecosystem too.
Tests now pass with python/cpython#119361.