PEP 3119: Resolve unreferenced footnotes #3259
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gvanrossum
reviewed
Aug 3, 2023
|
|
||
| .. [8] Putting Metaclasses to Work: A New Dimension in Object-Oriented | ||
| Programming, by Ira R. Forman and Scott H. Danforth | ||
| (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0201433052) | ||
| (https://archive.org/details/PuttingMetaclassesToWork) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Whoa, this link works. Is archive.org special-casing certain books?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was also amazed that the Amazon.com link works some 16 years on!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So it appears archive.org lost a lawsuit about their hosting free copies of books1. This link (and others like it) might stop working as a result?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for letting me know, we probably shouldn't link to legally dubious content -- I have opened #3289 to go back to the old link.
A
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Footnote [2] existed in the first draft, unreferenced. Footnote [3] was added in e06f400 and had its only reference removed in 3ff288b. Footnotes [9] and [10] were added in ac9a270 and had their references removed in 842b40e, when the Ordering ABCs were removed from the PEP. I've retained all four, removing the markup.
A
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--3259.org.readthedocs.build/