Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inconsistent IDP extension constraint check #11467

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2024
Merged

Inconsistent IDP extension constraint check #11467

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2024

Commits on Aug 21, 2024

  1. Per RFC5280 Section 5.2.5, the Issuing Distribution Point extension i… 

    …n a CRL can have only one of onlyContainsUserCerts, onlyContainsCACerts, onlyContainsAttributeCerts set to TRUE. However, extensions.py (lines 1991 : 2003), indirectCRL is also included, which leads to invalid CRL even if the RFC requirement is met. The proposed fix is to drop indirectCRL from the check so it conforms to the RFC.
    @hwooley
    hwooley committed Aug 21, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    8ccec8d View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Oct 11, 2024

  1. Made the comment shorter per line to meet the format requirement. 

    Removed a invalid test case for IDP
    @hwooley
    hwooley committed Oct 11, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    cd41a1f View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history