Fix typo (Flask-OpenID -> Flask-OIDC) #94
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@twosigmajab If you want this resolved i'm maintaining a fork of this with some added extensibility. Feel free to open a PR here: |
|
Thanks for the heads up @svintit, but I'm no longer considering using any of these projects at this time. |
|
No worries @twosigmajab best of luck! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While I'm here, may I also ask what is the relationship between Flask-OIDC and Flask-OpenID? They seem related, but neither seems to be a drop-in replacement for the other, and neither's docs explain this.
All I can tell is that Flask-OpenID has a much higher "Used by" count on GitHub (currently 3k vs. 169), Flask-OpenID is less frequently and recently updated, and this project's maintainer, @puiterwijk, appears to have taken over maintenance of Flask-OpenID as well (hence this typo?:).
Thanks in advance for any clarification!