Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to rrOSt base #16

Open
wants to merge 48 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Switch to rrOSt base #16

wants to merge 48 commits into from

Conversation

PitchBlackNights
Copy link
Member

I recently found rrOSt (rust-raspberrypi-OS-tutorials), and it seems like it would work better than blog_os. It is further developed and already has built-in support for other architectures.

DO NOT MERGE YET! THIS IS BEING USED FOR BRANCH MANAGEMENT

Pull request type

Please check the type of change your PR introduces:

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (functional changes, api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other (please describe):

What is the current behavior?

Current circumstance with blog_os is not very good. We are just waiting on v3 of their tutorials because it introduces some changes that we need dearly. blog_os is also hard to work with when it comes to porting to different architectures, because of the nature of its hardcoded x86_64 processor features.

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

  • Easier to work with other arch's
  • Compiles with make
  • Uses Docker for needed applications (Ex: qemu)
  • Compiles directly to a bare metal disk file, so all you need it to flash it to a drive.

Other information

Is licensed under Apache 2.0 NoHarm (from Lupine-OS) and MIT (from rrOSt)

@PitchBlackNights PitchBlackNights self-assigned this Aug 27, 2023
@PitchBlackNights PitchBlackNights added the in progress This issue is currently being worked on label Aug 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in progress This issue is currently being worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant