Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update vitest monorepo to v3.0.7 #7598

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 25, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@vitest/ui (source) 3.0.6 -> 3.0.7 age adoption passing confidence
vitest (source) 3.0.6 -> 3.0.7 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (@​vitest/ui)

v3.0.7

Compare Source

   🐞 Bug Fixes
   🏎 Performance
    View changes on GitHub
vitest-dev/vitest (vitest)

v3.0.7

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 8am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested review from jharrell and nikolasburk February 25, 2025 04:29
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from af48c4d to 9d1b4a4 Compare February 25, 2025 18:42
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch from 9d1b4a4 to 0102f41 Compare February 26, 2025 00:38
@jharrell jharrell merged commit b90cf86 into latest Feb 26, 2025
38 checks passed
@jharrell jharrell deleted the renovate/vitest-monorepo branch February 26, 2025 00:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant