Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade dependencies #481

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023
Merged

Upgrade dependencies #481

merged 3 commits into from
Sep 5, 2023

Conversation

Danielius1922
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 5, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #481 (06badf4) into master (2f8ee9c) will increase coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 87.50%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #481      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.42%   72.54%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          70       71       +1     
  Lines        5437     5441       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         3938     3947       +9     
+ Misses       1106     1104       -2     
+ Partials      393      390       -3     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
net/dtlslistener.go 71.13% <66.66%> (+1.74%) ⬆️
net/udplistener_1_18.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes

go.mod Outdated
Comment on lines 28 to 33
exclude (
// note: github.com/pion/dtls/v2 must be kept at v2.2.8-0.20230828143201-609e5bee6eb0 as long as golang1.18 is supported
github.com/pion/dtls/v2 v2.2.8-0.20230904031456-60064c6543dd
// note: github.com/pion/transport/v2 must be kept at v2.2.2 as long as golang1.18 is supported
github.com/pion/transport/v2 v2.2.3
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we avoid this as soon as I get pion/dtls#582 in, which will hopefully be today 👍🏻

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that would be much better, I wouldn't have to do the excludes then and we can use latest code.

In fact, the current build of plgd/device and plgd/hub is broken since #473 got merged, I forgot to check the compilation of our other repos before it was merged. We were discussing with @jkralik whether to simply not update plgd/device and plgd/hub repos until we drop support for go1.18, but if you can make it compatible that will be the best case scenario.

I can wait, no problem, it's just our convention that I update the repos at the start of a month.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Danielius1922 just merged! should be able to update now :)

actions/checkout v3 -> v4
Added to ensure that go 1.18 works until its support is dropped.
Submodule:
github.com/pion/dtls/v2 v2.2.8-0.20230905141523-2b584af66577
github.com/pion/transport/v3 v3.0.1
golang.org/x/exp v0.0.0-20230817173708-d852ddb80c63
golang.org/x/net v0.14.0

Indirect:
golang.org/x/crypto v0.13.0
golang.org/x/sys v0.12.0
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Sep 5, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@Danielius1922
Copy link
Member Author

Danielius1922 commented Sep 5, 2023

Running tests:

@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2023 17:13
@Danielius1922
Copy link
Member Author

@hasheddan nicely done, everything works! Thank you for the assist ( or the goal, since you've done more of the work 🥂 )

@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 merged commit dc9dac3 into master Sep 5, 2023
11 checks passed
@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 deleted the adam/feature/update-deps branch September 5, 2023 17:17
@hasheddan
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks to you as well @Danielius1922!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants