Skip to content

*: bump crypto and aws-sdk-go-v2#5699

Merged
ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
pingcap:masterfrom
wk989898:deps-0721
Jul 21, 2026
Merged

*: bump crypto and aws-sdk-go-v2#5699
ti-chi-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
pingcap:masterfrom
wk989898:deps-0721

Conversation

@wk989898

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #5693

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Questions

Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?

Release note

Please refer to [Release Notes Language Style Guide](https://pingcap.github.io/tidb-dev-guide/contribute-to-tidb/release-notes-style-guide.html) to write a quality release note.

If you don't think this PR needs a release note then fill it with `None`.

Signed-off-by: wk989898 <nhsmwk@gmail.com>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Jul 21, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@wk989898, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 47 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 06cef6d4-4693-44d4-91b9-07520479ab4e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2667ed8 and a7ad5cd.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • go.mod
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 21, 2026
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. approved labels Jul 21, 2026
@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 3AceShowHand, lidezhu

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [3AceShowHand,lidezhu]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Jul 21, 2026
@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2026-07-21 03:47:06.47177558 +0000 UTC m=+1290212.507870635: ☑️ agreed by 3AceShowHand.
  • 2026-07-21 03:49:03.776205917 +0000 UTC m=+1290329.812300983: ☑️ agreed by lidezhu.

@ti-chi-bot
ti-chi-bot Bot merged commit 1e28260 into pingcap:master Jul 21, 2026
24 of 25 checks passed
@wk989898 wk989898 added the needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. label Jul 21, 2026
@ti-chi-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.5: #5700.
But this PR has conflicts, please resolve them!

@wk989898

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

/cherry-pick release-nextgen-202603

@ti-chi-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@wk989898: new pull request created to branch release-nextgen-202603: #5701.
But this PR has conflicts, please resolve them!

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-nextgen-202603

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

wk989898 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2026
* This is an automated cherry-pick of #5699

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>

* update

Signed-off-by: wk989898 <nhsmwk@gmail.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <ti-community-prow-bot@tidb.io>
Signed-off-by: wk989898 <nhsmwk@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: nhsmw <nhsmwk@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-8.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.5 branch. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Security risks brought by vulnerable dependencies

4 participants