-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 444
extract the root from the site block (get rid of double root directive) #2311
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
henderkes
wants to merge
10
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
enhancement/optional-root
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+62
−5
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3a54a40
extract the root from the site block (get rid of double root directive)
henderkes bcf3e68
fix: support multiple roots defined
henderkes 8d14123
use new exported h.State["root"]
henderkes 824f93f
safety check for placeholders
henderkes 0d0f336
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into enhancement/optional-…
henderkes c8c459d
fix: make tests fail instead of hang in case a request timed out
henderkes d400fe5
change was merged upstream
henderkes 1d9fc41
create test that indirectly checks it works
henderkes 98268f6
revert deprecation
henderkes df197b2
extend test
henderkes File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this test also green on
main? Maybe would make sense to test with multiplephp_serversand multiple roots.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would fail to start because it wouldn't find the
worker-with-counter.php. But yes, I'll do that!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh because the path will be relative to the working directory and not relative to the server root. I guess it makes sense then 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes this a small BC break though for people expecting the working directory. I wonder if we should check both relative path to root and relative path to working directory. Or at least warn if one or the other was found.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sadly I think we can't do this at all, after all.
#2311 (comment)
Ugh, I'm so tired of double typing the root :(