Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🚨 [security] [ruby] Update fugit 1.11.0 → 1.11.1 (patch) #171

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Aug 19, 2024


🚨 Your current dependencies have known security vulnerabilities 🚨

This dependency update fixes known security vulnerabilities. Please see the details below and assess their impact carefully. We recommend to merge and deploy this as soon as possible!


Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

↗️ fugit (indirect, 1.11.0 → 1.11.1) · Repo · Changelog

Security Advisories 🚨

🚨 fugit parse and parse_nat stall on lengthy input

Impact

The fugit "natural" parser, that turns "every wednesday at 5pm" into "0 17 * * 3", accepted any length of input and went on attempting to parse it, not returning promptly, as expected. The parse call could hold the thread with no end in sight.

Fugit dependents that do not check (user) input length for plausability are impacted.

Patches

Problem was reported in #104 and the fix was released in fugit 1.11.1

Workarounds

By making sure that Fugit.parse(s), Fugit.do_parse(s), Fugit.parse_nat(s), Fugit.do_parse_nat(s), Fugit::Nat.parse(s), and Fugit::Nat.do_parse(s) are not fed strings too long. 1000 chars feels ok, while 10_000 chars makes it stall.

In fewer words, making sure those fugit methods are not fed unvetted input strings.

References

gh-104

Release Notes

1.11.1 (from changelog)

  • Prevent nat parsing chocking on long input (> 256 chars), gh-104

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 9 commits:

↗️ concurrent-ruby (indirect, 1.3.3 → 1.3.4) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

1.3.4

What's Changed

  • Update comment for JRuby variant of processor_count to reality by @meineerde in #1054
  • Add Concurrent.cpu_requests that is cgroups aware. by @heka1024 in #1058
  • Fix the doc of Concurrent.available_processor_count by @y-yagi in #1059
  • Fix the return value of Concurrent.available_processor_count when cpu.cfs_quota_us is -1 by @y-yagi in #1060

New Contributors

Full Changelog: v1.3.3...v1.3.4

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 10 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Aug 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants