Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge latest PG16 access/heap changes #13

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

dAdAbird
Copy link
Member

@dAdAbird dAdAbird commented Sep 6, 2023

Merge of PG's src/backend/access/heap/ changes. Trying to minimise changes so access/heap methods remain with original names.

based on PG's:

commit 9ddecd40664f7523b18f760aea0e04936e8a2302
Author: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Sep 5 11:36:55 2023 +0200

codeforall and others added 2 commits September 4, 2023 21:30
Store and fetch relation keys from fork
based on:
commit 9ddecd40664f7523b18f760aea0e04936e8a2302
Author: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Sep 5 11:36:55 2023 +0200
Copy link
Collaborator

@dutow dutow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The README also needs to be updated with the new commit ref.

@dutow
Copy link
Collaborator

dutow commented Sep 7, 2023

And also the commit ref in the CI scripts (.github directory)

@dAdAbird dAdAbird requested a review from dutow September 8, 2023 08:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@codeforall codeforall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@hqakhtar hqakhtar force-pushed the tuple_enc branch 2 times, most recently from 3d128f9 to 78c64b3 Compare September 13, 2023 15:31
@dAdAbird dAdAbird closed this Sep 14, 2023
@dAdAbird dAdAbird deleted the pg16_merge_m branch September 15, 2023 14:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants