-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/valkey support #597
Feat/valkey support #597
Conversation
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 39s |
6d6d60a
to
4d0d159
Compare
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 02s |
4d0d159
to
713d64c
Compare
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 41s |
713d64c
to
f153287
Compare
Build failed. ❌ pre-commit NODE_FAILURE Node request 200-0007605115 failed in 0s |
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 38s |
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 59s |
1. Rely on a single tag ‹with_kv_database› for deciding whether it should be deployed or not. 2. Introduce a new variable ‹kv_database› that holds the name of the KV database that might be deployed. - Also allows for easier deduction of the hostname and makes sure that there's always at least one deployment of any kind, i.e., it is now not possible to require it present, but have incorrect combination of flags, e.g., neither ‹with_redis› nor ‹with_redict› set. 3. Add it to templates where it's been forgotten. Signed-off-by: Matej Focko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matej Focko <[email protected]>
The leaks in short-running pods result in idle connections to Redict/Valkey, all of these KV-databases have ‹timeout› option in their config that allows for iterative cleanup of hanging connections. This mitigates the issue to the point of still having free connections slots to Redict/Valkey, i.e., the pods shall be killed, but handlers do not end up in a retry-loop trying to connect to Redict/Valkey. Since the config is 1:1 between all Redis, Redict, and Valkey, create one ConfigMap, map the config into the databases and pass the path to the config as an argument. Tested with Redict and Valkey. »NOT« tested with Redis. Related to packit/packit-service#2522 Signed-off-by: Matej Focko <[email protected]>
c000b31
to
64cdcec
Compare
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 00s |
redis: "{{ with_redis }}" | ||
redict: "{{ with_redict }}" | ||
redis: "{{ with_kv_database and kv_database == 'redis' }}" | ||
redict: "{{ with_kv_database and kv_database == 'redict' }}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
redict: "{{ with_kv_database and kv_database == 'redict' }}" | |
redict: "{{ with_kv_database and kv_database == 'redict' }}" | |
valkey: "{{ with_kv_database and kv_database == 'valkey' }}" |
Not sure why we need this facts but isn't valkey
missing here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, right, must've missed it.
This builds up the optional_deploymentconfigs
, from that we build the deploymentconfigs
and finally it's checked here
deployment/playbooks/deploy.yml
Lines 440 to 446 in 2892b42
- name: Wait for deploymentconfig rollouts to complete | |
# timeout 15min to not wait indefinitely in case of a problem | |
ansible.builtin.command: timeout 15m oc rollout status -w deploy/{{ item }} | |
register: oc_rollout_status | |
changed_when: false | |
failed_when: '"successfully rolled out" not in oc_rollout_status.stdout' | |
loop: "{{ deploymentconfigs }}" |
that they're running. It's a bit flaky though, cause it doesn't work properly if you don't run oc project ‹packit namespace›
beforehand in the terminal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🙏🏻
0dc44f5
to
9bb28fb
Compare
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 42s |
- Remove tags for redis and redict, they would not be very helpful, since the specific implementation of KV-DB is taken from the variables anyways - Add missing Valkey to the deploymentconfigs - Add comment with options to the deployment templates Co-authored-by: Maja Massarini <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matej Focko <[email protected]>
9bb28fb
to
660a23a
Compare
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 39s |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Related to packit/packit-service#2522