Recursive Address /r/address/:address

[elocremarc]

This PR will add the ability for an inscription to know runes balances, sat balances, Inscriptions and outputs for any address recursively.

Note:
This will need #3891 for an inscription to find an address to query this endpoint with.

[lifofifoX]

If we truly desire rune-aware inscriptions, it might be worth upgrading the Rune protocol to make them inscription aware and allow deposits/withdrawals of Runes to/from an inscription.

For example, add an inscription flag to the Edict struct, requiring it to be set for both deposits and withdrawals, indicating that the balance should go to the first inscription in the edict output. The balance could then be exposed via /r/inscription endpoint.

[ameenwire100]

Nice work

[raphjaph]

I don't think it makes sense right now because the address index is extremely new and untested. Creating a heavy dependency on it through a recursive endpoint would not be ideal. Have you built the address index and tried playing around with this endpoint?

[switch-900]

This should be looked at properly, the the possibilities of this are very valuable to the building community.