-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
release: 0.1.0 #5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
stainless-app
wants to merge
195
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
release: 0.1.0 #5
stainless-app
wants to merge
195
commits into
main
from
release-please--branches--main--changes--next
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
b8cb0be to
a4aa7a5
Compare
ab68615 to
928b193
Compare
dea3b1c to
8e82a6b
Compare
70c0deb to
7aba513
Compare
7aba513 to
a3aeae6
Compare
`ConversionRateConfig` is defined in lots of places in the SDK. This commit extracts it to a shared model to reduce code duplication. Its new location is `orb-java-core/src/main/kotlin/com/withorb/api/models/ConversionRateConfig.kt`
a3aeae6 to
5d06f04
Compare
33fe762 to
51f530e
Compare
51f530e to
dab9ea9
Compare
dab9ea9 to
aadcf13
Compare
aadcf13 to
e78e9dd
Compare
e78e9dd to
03a6f6c
Compare
03a6f6c to
e252ace
Compare
e252ace to
f01a2b4
Compare
f01a2b4 to
29612df
Compare
29612df to
1df8efd
Compare
1df8efd to
942fe99
Compare
942fe99 to
cb24616
Compare
cb24616 to
73c6b77
Compare
sskhandek
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated Release PR
0.1.0 (2026-01-14)
Full Changelog: v0.0.1...v0.1.0
⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
DateTimeOffsetinstead ofDateTimeFeatures
HttpResponse.ReadAsStreammethod (3a51242)ToStringimplementations (f6cc928)User-Agentheader (d9f32d8)X-Stainless-Archheader (11b2877)X-Stainless-LangandX-Stainless-OSheaders (ff4a7fe)X-Stainless-Package-Versionheaders (d3b8497)X-Stainless-RuntimeandX-Stainless-Runtime-Version(a49e832)X-Stainless-Timeoutheader (569bcb2)Bug Fixes
MaxRetries = 0(54eb187)DateTimeOffsetinstead ofDateTime(aa4b2f8)JsonElementin more places (1de7a74)Performance Improvements
HttpResponse(0466032)Chores
ClientOptionsstruct (b7feea0)Random.Sharedin newer .NET versions (5496540)using(d670d93)Documentation
WithOptions(0b988e2)Refactors
JsonDictionaryidentity methods (d4f5c97)ModelBase(ebf0a3e)ClientOptions(118fd1e)ClientOptionsinstead of client (7ae1ca0)JsonElementconstant construction (999a253)This pull request is managed by Stainless's GitHub App.
The semver version number is based on included commit messages. Alternatively, you can manually set the version number in the title of this pull request.
For a better experience, it is recommended to use either rebase-merge or squash-merge when merging this pull request.
🔗 Stainless website
📚 Read the docs
🙋 Reach out for help or questions